My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-10-2019 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2019 Packets
>
10-10-2019 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2021 3:52:45 PM
Creation date
1/13/2020 3:52:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
10/10/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Charter Commission <br />May 9, 2019 <br />Page 2 <br />46 against a project and noted that perhaps the information can be available in electronic format. He <br />47 noted that perhaps a pamphlet on the City Charter and Commission could be made available at <br />48 City Hall as well. <br />49 <br />50 Commissioner Damiani agreed that it would be helpful to have the information available online. <br />51 <br />52 Commissioner Juni noted that the City Clerk responded that she is available to assist residents <br />53 that may want help. He stated that perhaps something is published in the City newsletter letting <br />54 residents know that the City Clerk would be the contact for assistance. <br />55 <br />56 Commissioner Lyden stated that perhaps that contact information could be listed under the City <br />57 Charter page as well. <br />58 <br />59 Chair Dahl stated that she would follow up to determine if the information could be added to the <br />60 City Charter page of the website. <br />61 <br />62 Commissioner Trehus stated that the City Clerk is not an attorney and if she is helping to word a <br />63 petition for signatures, could that then be a situation where the City Attorney determines that the <br />64 language is not appropriate and therefore is not valid. He stated that it could be helpful to have <br />65 some sample petition templates available for residents to use. <br />66 <br />67 Commissioner Juni stated that it could be difficult to develop templates as the scope of potential <br />68 templates would be impossible to guess. He stated that he would hope that if the City Clerk is <br />69 working with a resident on a petition format, he would hope that the City Attorney would be <br />70 consulted to ensure it is the valid format. <br />71 <br />72 Commissioner Trehus suggested that Chair Dahl ask the City Clerk the estimated length of time <br />73 that would be necessary for staff to assist a resident in creating a valid petition form that could be <br />74 used to gather signatures. <br />75 <br />76 C. Legal Representation <br />77 Chair Dahl stated that she emailed many Charter cities in attempt to gather information on <br />78 possible legal representation. She stated that the three responses that she received all <br />79 recommended the use of Kennedy and Graven. <br />80 <br />81 Commissioner Poehling asked if any of the responding cities indicated their legal budget. <br />82 <br />83 Chair Dahl noted that most Charter cities are funded by the city. <br />84 <br />85 MOTION by Commissioner Juni, seconded by Commissioner Bretoi, requesting that the Chair <br />86 reach out to Kennedy and Graven to solicit information on their service package to act as <br />87 representation for Charter Commissions. <br />88 <br />89 Motion passed unanimously. <br />90 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.