10-28-2019 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MINUTES DRAFT 4 iii) Consider Resolution No. 19-130 Approving Site Improvement Performance Agreement 131 Council Member Manthey moved to approve the First Reading of Ordinance No. 09-19 and to approve 132 Resolutions No. 19-129 as presented. Council Member Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on 133 a voice vote. 134 Council Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 19-129 as presented. Council Member 135 Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 136 Council Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 19-130 with the addition of fencing to be in 137 place by the end of this year and required paving to be in place by June 30, 2020. Council Member 138 Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 139 6C) Consider Resolution No. 19-131 Approving Watermark PUD Development Stage Plan 140 Amendment #3-Architectural Design Standards – City Planner Larsen reviewed a Powerpoint 141 presentation inclduing information on the following: 142 - History (council actions); 143 - Resolution includes language related to garage requirements; 144 - Proposed Amendment related to the garage protrusion; 145 - Plans (indicating garage length, not to exceed 67% of the façade of the house); 146 - Elevations (four that they will offer, all to meet the 67% requirement); 147 - Planning and Zoning Board recommendations. 148 Council Member Rafferty asked about clearance within the width of the garage; it appears to be 149 narrow. The developer noted that each stall would be 10 feet at a minimum. Josh Metzer, Lenar, 150 explained that these series of homes are sold in many communities and he hasn’t heard any 151 discussion about the width of the garages; for the people that are buying the homes, it seems like the 152 garage space is sufficient. 153 Mayor Reinert remarked that it’s common to want to a larger garage. It’s understandable and 154 would be great to get a larger garage for this development. The city’s advisory group supports the 155 change unanimously. 156 Council Member Maher asked, regarding the Portland model, is the garage façade even or is the 157 single stall brought out? The developer responded that the third stall is required to be recessed. 158 159 Council Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 131 as presented. Council Member 160 Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 161 162 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 163 164 There was no Unfinished Business. 165 166 NEW BUSINESS 167 168 There was no New Business. 169 170 COMMUNITY EVENTS 171