11-25-2019 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

S:\Community Development\Projects\Planning Studies\2040 Comprehensive Plan\Agency Review\Affected Jurisdictions Review\20191106 Comments Review Page 6 2040 Comp Plan Review Key 11/6/2019 Material Editorial Note Commenter Date Comment #Page Section, Figure, Table, Etc.Column Comment MaterialEditorialNotePlan Change Made (Y/N) Comment Responses / Action Comments represent changes in material and content of the plan. Comments represent spelling, grammatical, clarification, or visual issues with graphics. Generally consist of a statement expressing a perspective. 4 The City would like to discuss the future I-35W /I-35E connector plans, such as the proposed full access interchange on 80th street. They would like to recommend exploring alternative solutions to reduce the potential adverse impacts on existing residential neighborhoods on Funnan St. NE (pictured on the back) caused by an increase in traffic volume. X N We encourage continued discussion with all affected jurisdiction including Anok and Washington County. See Hugo 1 below. City of Ham Lake 5/28/2019 None N/A 1 80th Street. As you may know, there was effort with the l-35W /E coalition to collaborate on improvements along 1-35 in several communities and Counties. The discussions included this connection and interchanges at l-35E and l-35W. Lino Lakes participated in the coalition meetings. The City is interested in cooperating with adjacent jurisdictions on creating a corridor management plan that would include representatives of the 1-35 W/E coalition to further this planning effort. In addition, the City supports an interchange location for l-35E at CR-140 (80th Street). X 2 CR-84. The Lino Lakes Transportation Plan recommends proposed new roadway connections. Specifically a new County north-south route (extension of CR-84/Otter Lake Road). It would seem that this road is intended to be a County Road shared by Washington and Anoka Counties. Similar to CR-140, we recommend a corridor study be initiated by Anoka and Washington Counties including representatives from all cities along the corridor. X N We agree. MnDOT 6/13/2019 Page 6-33 3 "Bus-Only Shoulders (BOS) allow buses to use the roadway shoulder to bypass automobiles that are in the general flow of traffic. They may only be used when the speed in the regular lanes drops to 30 mph or lower." 30 MPH is incorrect, it should be 35 MPH. X Y Will change. 1 General Comment The RMP is referred to as the City’s RMP, the RCWD’s RMP, and the City/RCWD’s RMP throughout the plan. Please revise for consistency and include RCWD in the reference. X Y Will change. (Only 12 Mike says) 2 Page 2-4 Lino Lakes RMP/Comprehensi ve Wetland Management Plan 2 “Comprehensive Wetland Management Plan” should be revised to “Comprehensive Wetland Protection and Management Plan” to be consistent with the WCA authority and title under which it has been developed.X Y Will change. 3 Page 2-4 Natural Resources Revolving Fund Plan 3 RCWD is unaware of the City’s 2017 wetland bank study and some of the identified locations on Figure 2-5. Please provide more information or reference to how the potential sites were identified.X N The City will provide a copy of the study. The plan is not pertinent for inclusion in the Comp Plan. 4 Page 2-16 Table 2.9 Net Acres/Net Land Area includes “as identified by the Rice Creek Watershed District”, however the inclusion of RCWD is unclear. Please clarify and indicate if the City means as identified by the National Wetland Inventory, RMP, or otherwise. X Y RMP RCWD 9/16/2019 City of Hugo 7/26/2019