Laserfiche WebLink
S:\Community Development\Projects\Planning Studies\2040 Comprehensive Plan\Agency Review\Affected Jurisdictions Review\20191106 Comments Review Page 7 <br />2040 Comp Plan Review Key <br />11/6/2019 Material <br />Editorial <br />Note <br />Commenter Date Comment <br />#Page Section, Figure, <br />Table, Etc.Column Comment <br />MaterialEditorialNotePlan <br />Change <br />Made <br />(Y/N) <br />Comment Responses / Action <br />Comments represent changes in material and content of the plan. <br />Comments represent spelling, grammatical, clarification, or visual <br />issues with graphics. <br />Generally consist of a statement expressing a perspective. <br />5 Chapters 3 & 10 Minnesota Statute (M.S.) 103E may be incompatible at times with the City’s <br />planned greenways and trails and will require early coordination with the RCWD, <br />which should be included in the discussion. The RCWD would be happy to meet <br />with the City to discuss further. <br />X N <br />The City appreciates the opportunity to meet <br />with the RCWD. <br />6 Page 5-11 Interstate 35E and <br />Co. Rd. 14 <br />Corridor (second <br />paragraph) <br />2 Please clarify if the referenced Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan <br />(CSMP) is the completed Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Area CSMP that was <br />conditionally approved by the RCWD Board and revise the language as needed. <br />If by “currently completing a CSMP” the City means it is currently building the <br />CSMP infrastructure, another sentence should be added. It is also RCWD’s <br />understanding that the CSMP area is for residential development, not <br />commercial or industrial. RCWD suggests adding language to this section to <br />clarify that the City is planning business and industrial development east of I-35E <br />and residential development west of I-35E, consistent with the City’s Future <br />Land Use Figure 3-2. <br />X Y <br />A reference to NE Lino Lakes Drainage Area <br />CSMP was added. No other changes necessary. <br />7 General <br />Comments on <br />Chapter 7 Local <br />Water <br />Management <br />Plan <br />In general, a detailed summary and duplicated sections of the LWMP are not <br />required. If the City intends to utilize the summary to move in a new direction <br />with the LWMP, the LWMP will need to be amended and follow the review <br />timelines of <br />M. S. 103B.235 and M.R. 8410. If the City intends to solely summarize the <br />information contained in the LWMP, RCWD recommends only including an <br />executive summary with reference to Appendix A and removing the duplicated <br />information to maintain consistency with the RCWD-approved LWMP in <br />Appendix A. There are currently a few inconsistencies in this chapter, discussed <br />in the comments below. <br />X Y <br />Will revise. <br />8 Page 7-2 Goal 2.2 2 A policy is missing that is contained in the LWMP in Appendix A and should be <br />revised to be consistent. <br />Will reivse. <br />9 Page 7-4 Goal 9.1, Policy b 1 This policy is inconsistent with the LWMP in Appendix A and should be revised <br />to be consistent. <br />Will reivse. <br />10 Chapter 7 Local <br />Water <br />Management <br />Plan Figures <br />- Page 7-6: Figure <br />7-1 <br />- Page 7-8: Figure <br />7-3 <br />- Page 7-14: <br />Figure 7-7 <br />- Page 7-17: <br />Figure 7-10 <br />Figures 7-1, 7-3, and 7-7 are not the same versions that are contained in the <br />RCWD-approved LWMP in Appendix A and should be removed or revised to be <br />consistent. Figure 7-10 and a few of the issues listed on the figure are not <br />contained or described in the approved LWMP in Appendix A. If Figure 7-10 is <br />utilized, RCWD recommends amending the LWMP and the City’s CIP table to <br />include and address the issues on Figure 7-10. <br />Will reivse.