My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/29/2020 EB Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2020
>
04/29/2020 EB Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2021 2:57:26 PM
Creation date
4/24/2020 11:18:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
04/29/2020
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item No. <br />Mitigation Description <br />Update <br />21.4 <br />Work with appropriate road authorities to mitigate the impact of the <br />This mitigation measure is ongoing. <br />additional traffic on the on the regional system, specifically Interstates <br />35W and 35E, by reconstructing each to provide a six -lane cross-section <br />consistent with the recommendations outlined in the I-35 IRC. It should be <br />noted that it was determined that an expansion will be necessary even <br />without the development scenarios used in this analysis. As the <br />interstates serve a much larger area, the projected growth of the entire <br />Twin Cities region should warrant expansion by the year 2030. <br />21.5 <br />Prioritize alternative travel modes within the AUAR study area and require <br />This mitigation measure is ongoing. <br />project proposers to address alternative travel modes (e.g., buses, <br />bicyclists, and pedestrians) by identifying appropriate accommodations. <br />21.6 <br />Consider the need for additional infrastructure improvements (see item <br />This mitigation measure is ongoing. <br />#21.2) in future updates or amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Submit the plan update to the appropriate agencies (i.e., FHWA, MnDOT, <br />Met Council, etc.). <br />21.7 <br />Require project proposers to follow all appropriate guidelines and policies <br />This mitigation measure is ongoing. <br />related to traffic nose and noise walls. <br />21.8 <br />Require that site plans for each of the developments include measures <br />This mitigation measure is ongoing. <br />such as appropriate setback distances, earthen berms, noise walls, and <br />appropriate site design to reduce the impact of traffic noise to residential <br />areas. <br />21.9 <br />Continue to require the implementation of the conditions of approval for <br />This mitigation measure is ongoing. <br />the Eagle Brook Church relating to mitigating traffic impacts. <br />21.10 <br />Achieve effective traffic operations within the city by requiring that site <br />This mitigation measure is ongoing. <br />plans make use of access management practices to promote safe, <br />effective traffic flow. <br />21.11 <br />Require project proposers to follow the Anoka County Highway <br />This mitigation measure is ongoing and has been <br />Department Development Review Process Manual (updated June 2013). <br />updated to reflect the newest manual. <br />21.12 <br />Continue to coordinate capital improvement programming with applicable <br />This mitigation measure is ongoing. <br />transportation authorities. <br />11 Mitigation Plan Update — 2020 January 31, 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.