Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />APPROVED <br />40 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />41 There was no report from the Public Services Department <br />42 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT <br />43 6A) NE Drainage Area Improvement Project — i. Consider Resolution No. 20-101, Order <br />44 Project, Approve the Plans and Specifications and Authorize the Ad for Bids; ii. Consider <br />45 Resolution No. 20-113, Approving Permit Agreement with the Board of Water Commissioners of <br />46 the City of Saint Paul — City Engineer Hankee noted the resolutions that would order the project and <br />47 set in place an agreement with the City of St. Paul. A figure was shown indicating existing <br />48 drainage (through drain tiles) in the NE area of the City. Ms. Hankee noted the size and location of <br />49 the improvement area. The City has been working on a drainage project to serve the area for <br />50 multiple years and has vetted different alternatives for drainage. The resulting recommendation is a <br />51 phased project that will include modeling and permit consideration to avoid negative impacts on <br />52 Peltier Lake. A best management practice system was used to ensure the betterment of the water <br />53 system. The first phase would be piping. Acquisition of properties as needed is underway. The <br />54 project is funded through the Surface Water Management Fund, an appropriate source. The <br />55 estimated cost is $1.2 million. The proposed schedule going forward was reviewed. There is a <br />56 small strip of land that is owned by the City of St. Paul and hence the need for an agreement. <br />57 Councilmember Stoesz asked if there is any guidance that would limit or allow certain working <br />58 hours. Ms. Hankee noted that currently the project work would be done during allowed construction <br />59 hours only. She doesn't suspect there would be much benefit to allowing extended hours but the <br />60 City can remain open to the idea if it makes sense. Mayor Rafferty said it makes sense to hear about <br />61 those on a case by case basis. <br />62 Councilmember Stoesz asked if all water will be moved to Lake Peltier or will there be some water <br />63 moved to the south. Ms. Hankee pointed out an area that will still drain to the south. <br />64 Councilmember Stoesz moved to approve Resolution No. 20-101 as presented. Councilmember <br />65 Cavegn seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. <br />66 Councilmember Stoesz moved to approve Resolution No. 20-113 as presented. Councilmember <br />67 Cavegn seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. <br />68 6B) Public Hearing. Consider Resolution No. 20-114, Adopting Assessment Role, 2020 Weed <br />69 Abatement Charges —Community Development Director Grochala noted that the City code <br />70 identifies weed violations. If violations are identified, City staff follows a process of notification <br />71 followed by weed removal if necessary. There is one case presented this year where City removal <br />72 occurred, costs were not paid, so therefore the cost will be assessed to the property. Notification of <br />73 actions is provided to the property owner. <br />74 Mayor Rafferty opened the public hearing. There being no one present wishing to speak, the public <br />75 hearing was closed. <br />76 Councilmember Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 20-114 as presented. Councilmember <br />77 Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. <br />78 6C) 2021 Street Improvement Projects — i. Consider Resolution 20-115, Authorize the <br />79 Preparation of Plans and Specs; ii. Consider Resolution No. 20-116, Approving Design Engineering <br />80 Services Contract with WSB & Associates — City Engineer Hankee reviewed a presentation. Two <br />81 resolutions are before the council. The City's Pavement Management Plan was explained; the <br />82 City's roadways and their condition is identified through the Plan; a maintenance program is <br />