Laserfiche WebLink
Property History <br /> The parcel, 23 Century Trail, is legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Century Farm North and was <br /> platted in 2003. It is 0.31 acres in size. It is a double frontage lot abutting Century Trail (front) <br /> and Pinto Lane (rear). Typically, the number of double frontage lots in plats are minimized; <br /> however, per the approved Century Farm North PUD Landscape Plan, the rear yard was to be <br /> protected by a Tree Preservation Area, remain undeveloped and therefore, not accessed from <br /> Pinto Lane. This Tree Preservation Area is also shown on the 2005 as-built survey. <br /> Unfortunately, in reviewing historical aerial maps, the trees were removed sometime between <br /> 2005 and 2008. See Attachment#2. <br /> Zoning Ordinance <br /> Per City Zoning Ordinance Section 1007.044(3)(h)6: Curb Cut/Driveway Access Location: <br /> d. A single-family lot in a residential zoning district shall not have more than <br /> one driveway accessing a public street. <br /> The property is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development and is a single-family lot in a residential <br /> zoning district. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow for an additional driveway access <br /> onto Pinto Lane. <br /> It is also important to note this section of the zoning ordinance applies to residential zoning <br /> districts such as R-1, R-2, PUD etc. Larger, rurally zoned parcels are allowed more than one <br /> driveway because they typically wider lots. <br /> Applicant's Narrative <br /> Attachment#3 is the applicant's narrative. Staff provides the following clarifying/additional <br /> information in italics: <br /> 1. The applicant states he is requesting a 10-foot wide variance for a second driveway. <br /> a. The variance is actually to allow for a second driveway. The driveway is <br /> proposed to be ]Oft wide. The variance is not related to the driveway width. <br /> 2. The applicant states that when the permit was approved on August 10, 2020 he was not <br /> aware that residential properties were only allowed one driveway per parcel. He then <br /> states it was on August 25, 2020 when he communicated with Diane Hankee, City <br /> Engineer, that he was made aware of the ordinance. <br /> a. Per email correspondence between Diane Hankee and the applicant on August <br /> 19, 2020, the applicant states "I understand I am not allowed to have a second <br /> driveway, but I am wondering how close I can go to Pinto Lane with a surface <br /> like class five rock, asphalt or concrete. "See Attachment#4. <br /> b. The applicant knew on or before August 19, 2020 that a second driveway was not <br /> allowed and potentially had time to redesign the garage if he wished. <br /> 2 <br />