Laserfiche WebLink
Park Board <br /> December 6, 1983 <br /> - page two - <br /> Mr. R. Johnson suggested this be tabled. Mr. Lindy felt this plat will <br /> not generate that much usage . <br /> Mr. Arntzen moved that Phase one, with the possibility of the developer <br /> deposit his excavation material in the area desingated as awalkway and <br /> to have the City Engineer contact the Circle Pines Engineer to determine <br /> the most logical area for the depositing of this material . Seconded by <br /> Mr. R. Johnson. Motion carried unanimously . <br /> BIDS - COUNTRY LAKE PARKS <br /> It was noted there is still only one bid and is from the same contarctor <br /> as before with the exception that this is a higher bid. <br /> The Board questioned the fact that only one bid had been received on <br /> both advertisements . Mr. Schumacher explained that this construction <br /> has many areas of doubt in the excavation and dredging so most contrac- <br /> tors don ' t like to get into an area such as this. <br /> Mr. R. Johnson moved to recommend acceptance of the Bid of H&S Asphalt <br /> for the construction in Country Lake Park. Seconded by Mr. Arntzen. <br /> Motion carried with Mr. Lindy abstaining. <br /> FIVE YEAR C. I .P. <br /> Mr. Schumacher asked Mr. R. Johnson if he had any comments on Item #6 <br /> before he had to leave. LL-L - POP-)() <br /> There was some discussion, with Mr. K. Johnson feeling this could be <br /> tabled since there is no immediate action necessary. Mr. Schumacher <br /> said there is a lot of material on this and several ways the Board may <br /> go - he would like at least fiveof the Board members present when a <br /> decision is made. <br /> This item was tabled for inclusion on the January agenda. <br /> Discussion on the Five Year C. I .P was continued with Mr. Schumacher notin, <br /> the items that are planned for completion in 1984. <br /> Mr. Arntzen suggested this item be tabled until the Board has a dollar <br /> amount to know what they are working with. <br /> There was concern with the fact that most of the directions from this <br /> Board fall on Mr. Volk to see that the work is completed and the general <br /> consensus of this Board was that Mr.Volk does not have the staff to <br /> see that this work is done. <br /> There was a suggestion that perhaps this work should bedone on a <br /> contracted basis . This would relieve some pressure on the Public W orks <br /> Department and insure that the planned improvements get done. <br /> n <br />