Laserfiche WebLink
Park Board <br /> January 5. .428.1 <br /> The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Park Board was called to order <br /> at 7 : 30 P.M. on Janaury 5 , 1981 by Acting Chairman Volk. Members present <br /> LeBBll�o$nd, $cherer, Johnson , Foster, Volk . Absent; Crouse, Liljedahl . <br /> On considering the minutes of December 7 , 1980 , Mrs . LeBlond asked that <br /> it be noted that she had been present at that meeting. The minutes were <br /> approved as corrected. <br /> Mr. Gary Tuschy was present to discuss and answer questions on a Bond <br /> Issue for the development of the parks . <br /> Mr. Schumacher explaned that Mr. Tuschy would also discuss the feasibilit <br /> of a bond issue. <br /> Mr. Tuschy said there are two things that have to be decided - 1) hwat <br /> the Park Board wants to do - he would suggest developing a Master Plan <br /> for the Parks to establish the needs before the Bond Issue . Then <br /> establish a cost estimate and set priorities as to what is needed <br /> immediately; 2) Then set up a bonding campaign , this should take about <br /> six week. This will take a lot of involvment by the Park Board. A <br /> committee must be set up with the duties of this committee to be out- <br /> lined by the Park Board. The contacts that must be done all lead up <br /> to the vote on the bond issue preferrable not on a general election <br /> day . Mr. Tuschy 's firm will put together a schedule for this work. <br /> Mr. Scherer asked for Mr. Tuschy 's opinion on the use of a bond issue <br /> for the construction of the building that had been propsoed for the <br /> City Hall Park. Mr. Volk asked what percentage of voters usually <br /> turn out as such an election and Mr. Tuschy said,, ususally a pretty <br /> good percentage particularly for park purposes . Mr. Tuschy said a <br /> building would be permissable if this is part of the material presented <br /> during the campaign . <br /> Mrs . LeBlond asked what percentage is need to pass such a bond issue <br /> and Mr. Tuschy said, a simple majority . Mr . Volk asked if there have <br /> been any special problems in the area of bond issues and Mr. Tuschy <br /> said only if people are not informed. <br /> The effect such an issue would have on real estate taxes was discussed <br /> and Mr. Tuschy said that would depend on the current status of the bond <br /> debt of the City. Mr. Tuschy said all this would be researched and <br /> would be in a brochure for presentation to the public. <br /> Mr. Scherer asked to the cost of running such a campaign and Mr. Tuschy <br /> said about $3500. 00 not to include the cost of the Master Plan . This <br /> amount is a flat fee - they do not work on a percentage of the bond <br /> issue . <br /> The many aspects of such a bond issue was discussed with Mr. Tuschy <br /> answering questions from the Board members . Mr . Tuschy said a bond <br /> issue could be run at the same time as a LAWCON Grant and the bond <br /> issue could be used as the matching funds portion . <br /> Mr. Volk asked if there was any better time of the year for a bond <br /> issue and Mr . Tuschy said either the Spring or the Fall seemed to be <br /> best . <br />