Laserfiche WebLink
June 4, 1979 <br /> The regular meeting of the Park Board was called to order at 8:14 p.m. , June 4, <br /> 1979. Members present: Chairman Ina Liljedahl , Tom Shaughnessy, Larry Crouse, <br /> Ken Johnson, Peter Scherer, and Charles Cheesebrough. Members absent: Gary <br /> Foster, and Council liaison Richard Zelinka. Also present was Don Volk. <br /> Mr. Shaughnessy moved to accept the minutes of the May 7, 1979 regular meeting. <br /> Mr. Johnson seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion declared passed. <br /> The first item for consideration was the review and discussion of the plans for <br /> the all-season building for Lino Park. Don Volk indicated that the draftsman <br /> had been unable to have the plans ready for this meeting, as requested, but would <br /> have them ready the next day, Tuesday, June 5. The Park Board felt that their <br /> recommendation should reach the Council by this month's meeting in order to take <br /> advantage of any grants available. Applications for grants had to be submitted <br /> by June 29. A special meeting of the Park Board was set for 7 p.m. , June 11, <br /> just before the Council meeting, to review the plans. A recommendation to the <br /> Council could be made at that time. Don Volk will deliver the plans to the <br /> Park Board members this week, so they can have time to look them over before the <br /> Monday meeting. <br /> Further discussion was held on the size and cost of the all-season building. <br /> Mr. Scherer suggested that if the Council authorized an expenditure of $50,000, <br /> and if a grant were available to cover an additional $20-30,000, then a $70,000 <br /> building could be put up. He felt that constructing a larger building at this <br /> time would be less costly than adding something later, which would cost that much <br /> more than it would today. It was brought up that once building plans are sub- <br /> mitted for a grant, they probably cannot be altered after they are approved. <br /> Mr. Crouse suggested writing a grant proposal for the most adequate building, <br /> and if the answer on that was negative, then submitting a smaller plan for <br /> Council approval . However, grant status would not be known until October, and <br /> construction was planned for this summer. Mr. Shaughnessy suggested having <br /> an extra wing or "L" on the plan submitted for a grant; if it wasn't approved <br /> then they could stay with the smaller building, which could be constructed in <br /> the meantime (during the summer) . <br /> Plans for a proposed park dedication area were presented for the Baldwin Lake <br /> Trailer Court expansion. The area proposed was on the shoreline of Baldwin Lake <br /> near the storage area. Also presented was a picture of the site, about 1.5 <br /> acres. The Park Board felt that the beach was unsuitable for recreation there, <br /> and that the area seemed to be somewhat closed in by roads servicing the trailer <br /> court. The Park Board felt a park or tot lot there should not be financed and <br /> maintained by public money as it would really only be serving the people in the <br /> trailer court. It was felt that this should be a private park, maintained by <br /> the people there. It was brought up that Sunset Oaks had put in a tot lot and <br /> recreational facilities at their own expense, as do most condiminiums and other <br /> developments of this kind. Mr. Johnson moved to recommend to the Council that <br /> cash be accepted in lieu of land, and that a tot lot be developed by these <br /> people in the area already proposed for a park site. It was added that although <br /> no time limit was set, this should be within a reasonable time. Mr. Shaughnessy <br /> seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion declared passed. This will be <br /> ,,.� put on the Council agenda. <br />