My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/07/1994 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1994 Park Board Packets
>
11/07/1994 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:55:09 PM
Creation date
6/4/2021 2:53:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
11/07/1994
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The aforementioned lots should be reconfigured to conform to R-1 <br /> lot depth requirements. <br /> The applicant should_provide a detailed landscape plan that would <br /> illustrate screening of the rear and side yards of double frontage <br /> lots and corner lots that abut collector or arterial streets . <br /> Specifically, we would recommend screening the following areas : <br /> Block 1, Lots 1-6 rear yards and Lot 22 side yard <br /> Block 2, Lot 1 side yard along Cedar Street <br /> Block 7, Lots 1-4 rear yards along Otter Lake Road <br /> Setbacks. The following table illustrates the minimum setback <br /> requirements within the R-1 Zoning District: <br /> Front Yard 30 feet <br /> Side Yard 10 feet <br /> Rear Yard 30 feet <br /> All proposed lots hold an ability to meet applicable R-1 setbacks . <br /> Streets. Generally speaking, the proposed street layout is <br /> consistent with that illustrated upon the previously submitted <br /> sketch plan and offers a positive circulation pattern. There are, <br /> however, a number of items which should be addressed as identified <br /> below: <br /> 1 . Street E. Street E, as identified on the preliminary plat, is <br /> at some future point intended to provide a southerly loop <br /> connection to Street A. This connection is, however, <br /> contingent upon development of property south of the subject <br /> site. Essentially then, Street E will exist as a 1, 200+ foot <br /> long cul-de-sac until southerly development occurs . In this <br /> regard, some precautions should be taken in the event that <br /> southerly development does not occur in the immediate future._ <br /> Specifically, the following steps are recommended: <br /> a. Those lots west of Street A which receive access via <br /> Street E be excluded from the subject plat and be <br /> developed as a future phase in conjunction with future <br /> southerly development . <br /> b. Some provision be made to provide a potential Street E <br /> loop within the subject site, should southerly <br /> development not occur. <br /> 2 . Temporary Cul-De-Sacs As a condition of subdivision approval, <br /> a temporary cul-de-sac will need to be constructed at the <br /> southern terminus of Street A. Temporary cul-de-sacs must be <br /> constructed at the full dimension of a permanent cul-de-sac. <br /> To avoid the need for a temporary cul-de-sac, the applicant <br /> may choose to plat Lots 12 and 13 of Block 5 as outlots for <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.