Laserfiche WebLink
WATER QUALITY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY <br /> SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT <br /> NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION TO ALL METROPOLITAN WATERS <br /> Summary of The Policy Issue <br /> In 1990 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Minnesota Pollution Control <br /> Agency (MPCA) agreed on a goal to reduce nonpoint source pollution in the Minnesota River by <br /> 40 percent from pre-1980 levels. The two agencies have set 1996 as the target date to achieve this <br /> goal. To accomplish this goal, current land development and agricultural practices must be altered <br /> to restrict nonpoint source pollutants from entering area water bodies. While the Minnesota River <br /> may be an acute case of water quality degradation due to nonpoint source pollution all water bodies <br /> in the seven county area are impacted to some degree by human activities in both urban and rural <br /> areas. <br /> The Mississippi River, especially in the Spring Lake and Lake Pepin area, is severally impacted by <br /> excessive algal growth. A major inter-state and federal study is currently being conducted to identify <br /> the causes of the excessive algal growth. However, it is known that nutrients, nitrogen and <br /> phosphorus, from whatever source are the prime cause of excessive algal growth. Both the State of <br /> Wisconsin and the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency are attempting to get the MPCA to impose <br /> phosphorus limits on the Metropolitan Plant in St. Paul as a means to reduce the algal growth. If <br /> phosphorus limits are imposed on the Metropolitan Plant this could result in capital expenditures of <br /> $80 to 360 million. Since phosphorus is found in surface water runoff it may be more cost effective <br /> to control nonpoint sources of runoff and have a more beneficial impact on the river than by <br /> controlling point sources of phosphorus. <br /> To address the acute problems on the Minnesota River, the Council developed an interim strategy <br /> for communities in the Minnesota River basin. This strategy incorporated basic water quality <br /> management practices that will improve the water quality of the area water bodies. During the public <br /> participation process in developing these strategies,it became clear that these same interim strategies <br /> were appropriate for all local governments in the seven county area. A consistent and equitable <br /> policy is established to apply these strategies metro-wide. <br /> The Problem <br /> The Metropolitan Council has documented an increase of nonpoint source pollution to area water <br /> bodies. These added pollutants reduce the recreational value and accelerate the eutrophication of <br /> area water bodies. The increase of nonpoint source pollutants to area water bodies can be traced <br /> to two primary sources: land development and agriculture practices. Land development or <br /> urbanization,generally increases both the volume of runoff as well as the concentration of pollutants <br /> in the runoff. This happens with the conversion of land to hard surfaces and by the destruction of <br /> wetlands. Detention ponds or artificial depressions can help mitigate these impacts. The best <br /> designed ponds, however,will not reduce the increased volume of runoff following urbanization nor <br /> will they totally remove the additional pollutants following urbanization. An increase in runoff <br /> volume, total phosphorus and other pollutants are the results of urban development. <br />