Laserfiche WebLink
Agriculture is still the predominant land use in a large portion of the seven county area and a major <br /> contributor of nonpoint source pollutants. Nonpoint source pollution from agriculture occurs as a <br /> result of intensive land cultivation and husbandry practices and shows up in three basic forms: soil <br /> erosion; agriculture supplements such as nutrients, pesticides and herbicides; and animal waste <br /> products. Each of these sources fill area water bodies smothering aquatic life, change the aquatic <br /> environment by limiting light penetration of the water,and result in the transmission of toxins to area <br /> water bodies. <br /> The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area is fortunate to have an abundance of lakes and rivers. These <br /> water bodies provide the area with recreational, aesthetic and educational benefits envied by other <br /> parts of the United States. Preservation of these water bodies and the associated wildlife habitat is <br /> a major component of the Council's planning framework. Measures to preserve and enhance the <br /> environment can be found in all of the Council's major system and policy plans. Policy 7 of the <br /> MDIF states that the Metropolitan Council: <br /> supports the maintenance of environmental quality throughout the region and will support <br /> programs or strategies to maintain_ or improve the natural Lar,'ronment (page 15). <br /> Reducing nonpoint source pollution to area water bodies has a number of positive outcomes. <br /> Reduced nonpoint source pollution has an overall positive effect on the environment, improves the <br /> water quality in lakes, wetlands and floodplains and allows for fishable and swimable water bodies. <br /> Water resource management has historically focused on point sources such as wastewater treatment <br /> plants and industrial facilities. Efforts to reduce pollution from point sources has been effective. <br /> Nonpoint source pollution abatement is the next challenge that must be addressed to ensure that <br /> water bodies in this metropolitan area are protected. <br /> Existing Legislative and Policy Structure For Addressing the Nonpoint Source Pollution Problem <br /> The Minnesota Legislature <br /> Two pieces of legislation have been passed in the last decade that set a framework for addressing the <br /> nonpoint source pollution issue. However, it will take several years to put this framework in place <br /> and will require local governments to extensively revise their surface water management plans and <br /> activities. <br /> Watershed planning legislation <br /> In 1982 legislation was passed requiring Watershed Management Organizations (WMO) to prepare <br /> watershed plans that addressed water quality issues. Under this legislation each WMO is to prepare <br /> a plan that states objectives and policies for water quality and identifies alternatives for improving <br /> water quality and methods of implementation. These plans are to be reviewed by the Metropolitan <br /> Council "in the same manner and with the same authority and effect as provided for the council's <br /> review of the comprehensive plans of local government units"(Minnesota Statutes,section 103B.231 <br /> subd.8(1990)). The Council is required to determine whether the watershed plan conforms with the <br /> management objectives and target pollution loads stated in the Council's water resources plan <br /> prepared pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 473.157. <br />