My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/07/1994 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1994 Park Board Packets
>
02/07/1994 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 1:14:12 PM
Creation date
6/11/2021 9:11:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
02/07/1994
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Evaluation of Sites for Park, Recreation, and Forestry Department <br /> South Athletic Complex City of Lino Lakes <br /> Evaluation Sheet for Parcel "C" <br /> Location: Holly Drive and Cedar Lake Zoning Status:Rural <br /> L-l <br /> Size: Approximately 86.5 Acres MUSA Line Status:Outside Current Metropolitan Urban Services Area <br /> Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Statements <br /> Location The site is located on the east side of Cedar Lake,a large wetland area. it is bounded on the <br /> "Is the site centrally located with respect to north by Holly Drive,a proposed collector street.However,Holly Drive is currently not a through <br /> user populations and other park system road. It is also one of the more centrally located of the sites being considered. <br /> components?" <br /> Site Size,Shape,and Orientation The site is approximately 86.5 acres in size,of which about 28.5 acres are classified as <br /> "Are these conducive to the type of facilities wetlands.Another five acres fall within a utility easement. For the most part,the wetlands <br /> programmed for this site?" follow the edge of Cedar Lake.However,they also encroach into the central area of the site, <br /> posing some additional constraints on facility design and layout. The higher areas outside the <br /> wetlands are suitable for this type of development. <br /> Topography Rolling topography is exhibited on the higher ground across much of the site. Although the <br /> ,#'Nil slopes and drainage patterns inhibit existing grades should not pose a significant constraint on development,the cost of grading <br /> ✓elopment?" would probably be greater on this site than at least some of the others. Providing positive <br /> drainage away from the playing fields and controlling storm water runoff should not pose any <br /> significant problems. <br /> Soils Most of the higher, non-wetland areas have loamy fine sand or fine sandy loam soils. Although <br /> "Are subsoils and topsoils suitable for this topsoil is limited,the subsoils are acceptable for this type of development. <br /> type of development?Will the watertable <br /> interfere with development?" <br /> Vegetation/Wetlands As stated,about 28.5 acres are classified as wetlands,which are protected. About eight of <br /> Will vegetation provide buffering ?Will it these acres encroach into the more central area of the site,posing some developmental <br /> conflict with site development?"Will wetlands constraints.The remainder of the wetlands skirt the western edge of the site adjacent to Cedar <br /> interfere with site development? Lake. Aside from the wetlands, the remainder of the site is used for agriculture or is tying <br /> fallow. <br /> Vehicle Access Vehicular access is very poor.Although Holly Drive has future potential as a collector street,it <br /> "Is the site accessible from arterial or does not provide adequate access to the site at this time. Even with Holly Drive upgraded, <br /> collector streets?" access would still be limited to one collector street,again resulting in a completely internal <br /> entrance drive which consumes excessive space and is costly to develop. <br /> Trail Access Until Holly Drive is upgraded to a collector street(which is on an indefinite timeframe),site <br /> "is the site accessible from the community access via transportation trail is not probable nor practical. Although there is a linear trail <br /> trail system?" corridor planned for the perimeter of Cedar Lake,its developmental timeframe is dependent <br /> upon MUSA line extension and housing development in this area (at least 10 plus years into <br /> the future) . <br /> Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 6 Project No. 93-35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.