My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/01/1994 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1990 Park Board Packets
>
10/01/1994 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:38:54 PM
Creation date
6/11/2021 12:41:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
10/01/1994
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> PARK BOARD MEETING <br /> October 1, 1990 <br /> The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Bob Williams at <br /> 7 : 00 p.m. at Lino Lakes City Hall. Members present were: <br /> Candace Toffoli, Bob Williams, John Baumann, Ken Johnson, <br /> Bill Nissen, and George Lindy. Absent was Ray Johnson. Staff <br /> in attendance were: Marty Asleson, Parks Superintendent and <br /> Carole Kohler, Parks Secretary. <br /> CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES: <br /> The minutes of the September 5, 1990 meeting were approved as <br /> presented. <br /> OPEN MIKE: <br /> No one appeared under open mike. <br /> NEW PARK DEDICATION FORMULA: <br /> In the absence of Don Volk, Marty Asleson explained the new <br /> park dedication formula. He feels that this is a more fair <br /> way to charge developers, and also recommended raising the <br /> lot price from $400. 00 to $500. 00 per. Marty explained the <br /> need to get additional monies into the dedicated park fund to <br /> purchase raw land in other areas where parks aren't practical <br /> in a particular development. Bill Nissen questioned the <br /> "changeability" of the new formula. What if developers aren't <br /> completely honest about fair market value when they present <br /> the development to the city for consideration? Marty <br /> explained that this probably couldn't happen as the County <br /> has assessed values recorded, but that he would check into it <br /> further. George Lindy questioned the density to percentage <br /> table currently used in figuring the new formula. He <br /> suggested the change be made to read: <br /> Density in Units/Acre <br /> FROM: TO: <br /> 0 TO 3 0 TO LESS THAN 3 <br /> 3 TO 5 3 TO LESS THAN 5 <br /> 5 TO 7 5 TO LESS THAN 7 <br /> 7 TO 9 7 TO LESS THAN 9 <br /> 10 OR MORE 9 OR MORE <br /> PERCENTAGE OF LAND DEDICATION WILL STAY THE SAME. <br /> A motion was made by George Lindy to accept the new park <br /> ''� dedication formula as presented with noted changes to density <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.