My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/04/1990 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1990 Park Board Packets
>
06/04/1990 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:03:01 PM
Creation date
6/11/2021 1:03:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
06/04/1990
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(612) 451-2266 <br /> South St. Paul <br /> Inver Grove Heights <br /> Chamber of Commerce <br /> 633 South Concord Street, Suite 304 <br /> South St. Paul, Minnesota 55075 <br /> TO: IGH Planning Commission/City Council <br /> FROM: IGH-SSP Chamber of Commerce <br /> SUBJECT: Chamber Testimony on IGH Park Dedication <br /> DATE: November 1, 1989 <br /> General Recommendations <br /> 1. The primary focus of the Chamber's recommendations will be commercial/ <br /> industrial oriented, but certain residential dedication issues will <br /> be addressed. <br /> 2. We are basically in support of the basic framework embodied in the <br /> existing ordinance and are not recommending a totally new ordinance <br /> on Park Dedication. <br /> 3. The Chamber of Commerce again accepts the premise that some commer- <br /> cial/industrial park dedication and appropriate levels of residential <br /> dedication should be made, but at the same time we support a park <br /> dedication ordinance that is competitive with other communities and <br /> clearly support development of quality facilities rather than dis- <br /> couraging it. <br /> 4. Park dedication should be paid by developers consistent with the in- <br /> tent of the Minnesota State Statutes which indicates that fees paid <br /> should correlate with demands placed on park and recreational facil- <br /> ities by this new development. We also support an education program <br /> in our community which the intent would be to adequately explain <br /> that park dedication fees are not, and should not be, the sole fund- <br /> ing source of park and recreational facilities, and local residents <br /> must be willing to accept a significant portion of the financial <br /> burden relating to park acquisition, development, and maintenance. <br /> Use of Park Dedication Funds <br /> The Chamber believes that the original use of park dedication funds <br /> coming from the commercial/industrial area was to control land use and <br /> acquire needed land for trail systems, and was not necessarily intented <br /> to be a major funding source. Currently however, the City perceives the <br /> commercial/industrial funds to be used for acquisition, development , and <br /> bond repayment of the park system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.