Laserfiche WebLink
Park Dedication <br /> I1/1/89 <br /> Page 3 <br /> ''I Form of Dedication <br /> Currently, the park dedication ordinance allows for either land or cash <br /> dedication. The Chamber strongly recommends that Inver Grove Heights <br /> follows the lead of an ever increasing number of cities which are requir- <br /> ing cash only. We believe cash dedication is preferable to land dedica- <br /> tion because of fairness to develoeprs, planning consistency, and certainty <br /> to the developer. <br /> We support the development of a currently commissioned park plan which <br /> will specifically identify properties needed for an overall city park <br /> system. We believe that the city, after appropriate citizen input, should <br /> adopt such a park plan, and the City then should not seek to use property <br /> outside of those identified in the park plan for park or trail use. <br /> We believe that the- park plan should be relied upon and used as a planning- <br /> and implementation tool -for a period of years from its adoption. We be- <br /> lieve the City should require cash park dedication fees and then in turn <br /> acquire the properties necessary for the implementation of their overall <br /> park plan. <br /> Appropriate Level of Fees <br /> Currently a formula exists which every two years readjusts the park dedi- <br /> cation fees with C and I property paying 5% of value and residential <br /> property paying 10% of value. The Chamber believes that the earlier <br /> recommendations outlined above, if accepted, would significantly enhance <br /> our park dedication system. And based on our assumption that the afore- <br /> mentioned reforms take place, we can support the existing park dedication <br /> fees. If however, the aforementioned reforms do not take place, signifi- <br /> cant reductions in the per acre fees must be considered. <br />