My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/03/1992 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1992 Park Board Packets
>
08/03/1992 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:26:37 PM
Creation date
6/18/2021 11:02:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
08/03/1992
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD <br /> JULY 8, 1992 <br /> record and he was not notified regarding the change. He further <br /> indicated that it is not feasible for them to develop the remaining <br /> lots with a wider street. Sewer and water is not available and <br /> probably will not be for a very long time, if ever, and he does not <br /> feel that curb and gutter necessary. Traffic in the area is minimal <br /> and will remain that way and the larger lots allow plenty of off <br /> street parking. Dedication of a 66' right of way would be <br /> provided, it is merely the constructed width of the street that is <br /> at question. <br /> Concerns of the Planning & Zoning Board included parking, safety in <br /> regard to the narrow streets and emergency vehicle access. Mr. <br /> Mesich asked why the narrower streets were not grandfathered in and <br /> was advised that this is a new development, thereby the current <br /> requirements apply. Mr. Brixius also explained that if the Board <br /> considers approving the request they should specify the uniqueness <br /> of the site to prevent other developments from seeking the same <br /> variance. He also suggested addressing drainage, restrictions on <br /> development, a 60' right of way dedication, and agreements to be <br /> assessed for sewer and water when available. <br /> MOTION: Landers recommended Option 1 denying the request for a <br /> variance to construct substandard streets. Nordine seconded the <br /> motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. <br /> F. 92-30, 7080 Lake Drive, Leszinski, Conditional Use Permit/ <br /> Site Plan Review <br /> M. K. Wyland reviewed this request and explained that it is to <br /> allow an Automobile Service Use in a General Business District. <br /> The home on the site would be considered an existing non-conforming <br /> use. <br /> MOTION: Gelbman moved and was supported by Mesich to approve the <br /> request with the following conditions: <br /> 1. Signs be located in conformance with existing sign <br /> ordinance and proper permits obtained. <br /> 2 . No exterior storage be allowed on the site, including <br /> vehicles being serviced. <br /> 3 . A refuse area be provided and properly screened from <br /> the street right of way. <br /> 4. Proper building permits be obtained for any <br /> construction/remodeling. <br /> All voted aye. Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.