My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/01/1993 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1993 Park Board Packets
>
03/01/1993 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 1:18:46 PM
Creation date
6/18/2021 1:36:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
03/01/1993
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I ! <br /> I ' <br /> RR BOARD MEETING <br /> y 9, 1990 <br /> g <br /> oded, populated with wetlands. There will be some wetland <br /> 11. The wetland by the proposed park land will be <br /> rtially filled. <br /> thin the site is a 2.75 acre parcel proposed for park. <br /> As is 75% percent of the park dedication required. A <br /> .tland area will be adjacent to the park land, but not used <br /> part of the park dedication requirement. <br /> ie developer proposes a park trail through the park, a play <br /> -ea for children, horseshoe pits, picnic tables, and a <br /> _ewing stand along the trail. <br /> i <br /> iy Johnson asked for clarification that the trails are not <br /> in of any park dedication requirement. <br /> i <br /> iy Johnson stated that when Dennis Ericksons developed D. <br /> -ickson's 2nd Addition, the park issue was not completed as <br /> as expected.. And the park board wants to be sure that the <br /> ark is completed as promised for Brandywood. <br /> teve Johnston's proposal is for the land, along with $7, 000 <br /> ash to complete the park dedication requirement. <br /> arl 'itzgerald, Developer, was also present at the meeting. <br /> hey have been negotiating with the property owners in <br /> urchasing land immediately south of this parcel, they have <br /> of resolved this issue yet. <br /> ark Fitzgerald stated that he talked with the adjacent land <br /> wners twice, and they made no decisions regarding whether or <br /> .ot they can purchase the land for park. They said they <br /> anted to think about it but wouldn't rule it out. They <br /> :onsider their property a hobby farm. If they sell a portion <br /> �f their land, they want to still be able keep their horse. <br /> _f he could get that in writing, from the city, then they may <br /> )e more willing. city code requires a five acre minimum to <br /> allow the resident to have a horse. If they sold enough of <br /> :heir land to meet the park dedication, the property owners <br /> could be shy of their five acre requirement by 4/10 of an <br /> acre. <br /> 3ill Nissen pointed out that if they do accept the park <br /> dedication and the $71000.00 cash. They could use that money <br /> towards putting something nice into that park. <br /> Steve Johnstone stated that he is proposing to develop <br /> approximately 1/3 or the site now. <br /> John Miller joined the meeting to answer some questions <br /> regarding this plat. <br /> He ''�id that this parcel is zoned rural. <br /> 4 <br /> Page 3 <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.