Laserfiche WebLink
Y r <br /> E <br /> City of Lino Lakes <br /> Park Board Meeting <br /> November 4, 1996 <br /> The November 4, 1996, City of Lino Lakes Park Board meeting was <br /> called to order at 6 :35pm, by Chair, George Lindy. <br /> Roll call was taken, members present were Betty Piper, Paul <br /> Montain, Pam Taschuk, George Lindy, Sharon Lane, Joe Schmidt and <br /> Amy Donlin. Also present were Marty Asleson, Park, Recreation, <br /> and Forestry Coordinator, Barry Bernstein, Recreation Program <br /> Supervisor, and Sandie Wood, Recording Secretary. <br /> APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM SEPTEMBER 4 OCTOBER 7 AND OCTOBER 16 • <br /> Paul Montain made a motion to approve the September 4, October 7, <br /> and goal setting minutes from October 16, 1996 . Amy seconded the <br /> motion and the minutes were approved as written. <br /> OPEN MIKE• <br /> There was no one present for open mike. <br /> BIRCBWOOD/PARR GROVE - PETITIONS: <br /> Marty gave background information on the Birchwood/Park Grove <br /> Park petitions . He reported that on July 7, 1996, the Park Board <br /> n approved the master plan for Birchwood Acres Park. The Park <br /> Board at that time informed the residents present, for this <br /> meeting, that this was a dynamic plan, that recreation needs <br /> change over time, and if residents want changes made they should <br /> come before the Park Board. <br /> Five petitions were presented to the City Council for forwarding <br /> on to the Park Board. At the last work session, the City Council <br /> discussed the process, and said the Park Board should review the <br /> petitions and make a decision. <br /> The five petitions were included in the packets along with the <br /> cover letter, that accompanied the petitions at the council <br /> meeting. Concept "A, B, C" from the master plan design process <br /> was also in the packets . <br /> Marilyn Anderson, City Clerk, has reviewed the petitions . A copy <br /> of Marilyn' s comments were also included in the packets . <br /> Marty said the options were to act on the individual petitions 1- <br /> 5 or defer back to staff for further review. <br /> Marty recommended that the petitions needed to be looked at in <br /> terms of the needs as presented in our Comprehensive Plan, and <br /> the carrying capacity of the park now and in the future. <br /> 1 <br />