Laserfiche WebLink
Planning&Zoning Board <br /> March 11, 1998 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Mr. Dunn also inquired as to the status of the architectural design guidelines for use by <br /> the Planning & Zoning Board. Mr. Wessel explained that the guidelines are coming <br /> together, for published form by the end of this year. <br /> Mr. Johnson expressed concern about the chimney height. Mr. Wessel pointed out that <br /> the chimney has been redesigned. Mr. Reese explained that the smokestack is diamond- <br /> shaped, and will be rotated so that it stands adjacent to the building with a point closest to <br /> the building. Additionally, there will be a cap at the top, with a substantial portion being <br /> constructed of masonry with a transition to metal. <br /> Mr. Dunn asked about Item"e"under the"Conditional Use Permit Review" portion of <br /> the executive summary,which reads: <br /> e. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public <br /> cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to <br /> the economic welfare of the community. <br /> Mr. Wessel stated that, with respect to the Early Childhood Learning Center,the lease <br /> arrangement will pay for this project. Therefore, there is no foreseeable risk to the <br /> community with regard to funding. <br /> Chair Schaps asked about the approximate cost of the project. Mr. Wessel explained that <br /> the original budget is $6 million. <br /> Mr. Herr asked about the planned technology for the proposed Council chambers. Mr. <br /> Wessel stated that the present technology would be installed within the new facility, and <br /> that it is included in the budget. <br /> Mr. Gelbmann asked about the necessity for approving this portion of the project prior to <br /> approval of the subdivision. Mr. Wessel explained that approval of the present matter <br /> will keep the project on schedule. <br /> Mr. Gelbmann asked about seating capacity within the new Council chambers. Mr. <br /> Wessel explained that the total capacity is 92, and that expansion could be accommodated <br /> within the concourse area through use of monitors. <br /> Mr. Gelbmann asked how the size of this proposed facility compares to those of other <br /> cities. Mr. Wessel explained that it is average size, with some others being larger and <br /> some smaller. <br /> Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:10 p.m., and was <br /> supported by Mr. Gelbmann. Motion carried, 6-0. <br />