05/04/1998 Park Board Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning&Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 3 7. All trash handling equipment is fully enclosed and screened from view of neighboring properties. 8. In compliance with Town Center design guidelines, site light fixture selection give attention to both function and aesthetics. 9. Site wetlands be specifically delineated and protected. (A delineation has been completed) 10. A grading and drainage plan be submitted which is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. (In process) 11. That all site signage comply with applicable Sign Ordinance requirements. Mr. Wessel addressed the group, explaining that the first phase of the subdivision was accomplished last year with the second phase delayed due to awaiting approval from the Metropolitan Council. Through use of visual aids, Mr. Wessel pointed out the proposed second-phase development. He pointed out the need to obtain Board approval at this time contingent upon subdivision approval in April, in order to keep the overall project on track. Mr. Johnson requested clarification regarding use of the Early Childhood Learning Center after it is no longer occupied by the School District. Mr. Wessel explained that this facility is intended to accommodate expansion needs following the School District's 10- year lease period. Chair Schaps asked about the difference between the size of the current City Hall and the planned facility. Mr. Wessel indicated that the new City Hall will be approximately three times as large as the current facility, allowing for consolidation of the majority of City services. Mr. Dunn asked about specific approval expectations. Mr. Wessel stated that overall response to the design has been favorable; however,there has been controversy about the architectural guidelines in general. He added that materials have been defined as brick, metal roof, and glass,with some wood accents. The specific brick,roof color, and wood finishes will be determined by the Town Center Committee. Mr. Dunn then asked about the architectural style. Mr. Wessel explained that the design is meant to feel more rural than urban; more informal than institutional. Mr. Reese of LPA stated that the Town Center design does not coincide with any particular style definition; but, if he had to make a comparison, it would be a vernacular,barn-like style, 11-N intended to be friendly and comfortable. He added that the proposed materials will be long-lasting and appropriate for a civic-type building.