05/04/1998 Park Board Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning&Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 12 Staff recommended,however,that these two new parcels be more consistent with the adjoining parcels in lot width, suggesting that Parcel B be increased in size by approximately 15 to 20 feet. This would also allow for a future 60-foot roadway and 145-foot-deep lots fronting this future roadway, should this area develop into an urban neighborhood. Approval was recommended, pursuant to the following conditions: l. The surveyor determines that there is at least 20% upland on both Parcel A and Parcel B. 2. Drainage easements as provided over any and all wetland on both parcels. 3. Parcel B be increased in lot width to be consistent with the adjoining parcels. 4. Parcel B be attached to the 10-acre parcel southerly of this site. Chair Schaps requested clarification that this request is to equal lot sizes. Ms. Wyland responded in the affirmative. She added that the reason one lot is smaller is due to the drain field, but that it could be expanded elsewhere should development become an issue. Mr. Dunn asked about existing utilities. Ms. Wyland explained that a water line extends down Cedar Street, but that no sewer is planned. The parcels are currently on septic systems. Pete Nadeau, 6644 Cedar, indicated that he approves of splitting the lots equally. Warren Solheid, owner of Lots A and B, also expressed favor with the proposed lot split. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the minor subdivision for Pierre Nadeau, 2068 Cedar Street, pursuant to the conditions presented, and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 6-0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Lake Business Park- Concept Plan Mr. Kirmis commented on the Lake Business Park Concept Plan, located south of Interstate 35W and west of Lake Drive. This project is within the Town Center area, overlaying approximately 35 acres of land, and calls for the creation of 11 lots ranging from approximately 1.7 acres to approximately 4.0 acres in size. The subject site lies within Planning District 1 (Town Center), and is subject to the applicable architectural guidelines. Mr. Kirmis explained that access has been adjusted to align with a future anticipated access to the west. Additionally,the concept plan calls for the creation of street extension �..