Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 23, 1998 <br /> Council Member Bergeson pointed out that a church in another community may install an <br /> antenna which will be considerably less noticeable than a new tower. This would be an example <br /> of the sensibility of using an existing structure. Mr. Kirmis added that structures can be added, <br /> such as a church bell tower,which would house an antenna and blend with the existing structure. <br /> He also stated that in other parts of the country other types of camouflage is often used. <br /> Council Member Lyden asked if"existing structure" in residential areas could be defined within <br /> the ordinance as"non-home". Mr. Kirmis suggested that a provision could be added prohibiting <br /> installation of antennas on residences. Mr. Hawkins cautioned against further restriction to the <br /> ordinance. Mayor Sullivan suggested infringement upon property owner rights. Mr. Hawkins <br /> responded that service provider rights rather than those of property owners would be the primary <br /> consideration. <br /> Peter Beck of AT&T addressed Council, stating that generally he finds the ordinance to be <br /> favorable, but that it is currently extremely restrictive and that there might be the need to revisit <br /> certain provisions as installations are proposed. He added that in his experience installation is <br /> never recommended on single family residences, and that prohibiting such installation would not <br /> pose a problem. <br /> Council Member Dahl asked about the safety of towers. Mr. Beck explained that service <br /> providers are careful to properly ground antennas, as well as to construct towers which can <br /> withstand stress from other natural sources. He added that the radio waves emitted by the <br /> antennas would be significantly less than those from other communication sources. �.. <br /> Council Member Dahl then asked about the number of antennas per structure. Mr. Beck <br /> responded that the intent is to install as many antennas on an existing structure as possible, and <br /> that typically there would be as many as three users per pole. <br /> Council Member Lyden moved to approve the February 16, 1998 draft ordinance amending the <br /> Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance by establishing regulations for construction and placement of <br /> wireless communication towers, equipment and facilities with the added condition that <br /> installation be prohibited on single family residences. Council Member Dahl seconded the <br /> motion. <br /> Council Member Bergeson suggested that the only existing structures within Lino Lakes that <br /> could accommodate telecommunication antennas are water towers. Ms. Wyland stated that there <br /> are other existing structures that would be appropriate for antenna installation. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Civic Campus Update, Interior Design Contract- Mr. Wessel explained that when the <br /> Leonard Parker Associates (TLPA)was selected as the architectural/engineering team for the <br /> proposed civic complex the firm's interior design capability and experience was a critical part of <br /> the approval decision. According to Mr. Wessel, Sarah Weiner, Director of Interior Architecture <br /> for TLPA, has been very much a part of the team and has made a significant contribution. He <br /> 10 <br />