My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/02/1998 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1998 Park Board Packets
>
02/02/1998 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 1:11:51 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 3:38:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
02/02/1998
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes a. <br /> Park Board Meeting <br /> n <br /> January 5, 1998 <br /> The January 5, 1998, City of Lino Lakes Park Board meeting was <br /> called to order at 6 : 41pm, by George Lindy, Chair. <br /> Roll call was taken, members present were Paul Montain, Pam <br /> Taschuk, George Lindy, Sharon Lane, and Joe Schmidt . Betty Piper <br /> and Kim Sullivan were absent. <br /> Also present were Rick DeGardner, Parks and Recreation Director; <br /> Barry Bernstein, Recreation Program Supervisor; and Sandie Wood, <br /> Office Manager. <br /> APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 19, November 25, and December 1, 1997 <br /> MINUTES: <br /> Paul Montain made a motion, seconded by Joe Schmidt to approve <br /> the November 19, November 25, and December 1, 1997 minutes, with <br /> Sharon Lane abstaining with regard to the November 25, 1997 <br /> minutes, and Pam Taschuk abstaining with regard to the December <br /> 1, 1997 minutes . The minutes were approved. <br /> OPEN MIKE : <br /> There was no one present for open mike . <br /> PARK DEDICATION ORDINANCE REVIEW: <br /> Rick DeGardner explained that at the December 1, 1997 meeting, <br /> staff was asked to check with several surrounding cities to <br /> compare Lino Lakes' Park Dedication Ordinance . He provided two <br /> surveys, one summarizing the Park Dedication Ordinances for 46 <br /> cities, and the second outlining Park Dedication Ordinances of <br /> seven surrounding communities . Rick pointed out that the <br /> majority require 10% of land to be developed, or cash equivalent. <br /> Pam asked if the 10% is mandated by State statute. Rick <br /> responded that it is not; each city can establish that <br /> requirement. <br /> George requested clarification of Shoreview' s "3% of gross" <br /> commercial and industrial land. Rick explained that where Lino <br /> Lakes requires 3% of gross upland, Shoreview requires 3% of the <br /> gross total land. He added that Cottage Grove is the only <br /> community with a requirement in addition to land dedication, <br /> which also requires $150 per unit for park development. <br /> Joe pointed out that Lino Lakes seems to place less value on <br /> commercial and industrial park dedication than neighboring <br /> communities . Rick explained that a valuation criteria is used <br /> for commercial and industrial areas and does not put as much <br /> demand on residential areas . <br /> Sharon asked how a community--specifically, Forest Lakes--could <br /> determine how many individuals would occupy each house in a given <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.