My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/02/1998 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1998 Park Board Packets
>
02/02/1998 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 1:11:51 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 3:38:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
02/02/1998
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 27, 1997 , <br /> Council Member Neal suggested that Ms. Phillips speak to Police Officer Hammes and give him <br /> whatever information she might have regarding traffic problems she had witnessed. �r <br /> Mr. DeMotts, 6265 Holly Drive, addressed the Council regarding campaign signs in the City. He <br /> distributed a copy of portions of the City's ordinance regarding signs, and read Section L. b. <br /> "Other Election Years",which states, in pertinent part: <br /> In years when no state general election is to take place, signs announcing <br /> candidates seeking public political office and other data pertinent thereto <br /> shall be permitted up to a total area of nine (9) square feet for each premise <br /> in a residential zone and thirty-two (32) square feet in an agricultural, <br /> commercial or industrial zone. These signs shall be confined within <br /> private property,provided that the property owner's permission has been <br /> obtained. ... <br /> Mr. DeMotts also read Section W, which states: <br /> All signs including temporary and portable over six(6) square feet in size <br /> shall require a sign permit. Permit fees shall be in accordance with a fee <br /> schedule as adopted by the City Council. <br /> Mr. DeMotts stated that he feels permits should have been issued, even though he believed no fee <br /> schedule had been prepared in accordance with Section W of the Ordinance. <br /> Council Member Neal asked the amount of a sign permit. Mayor Landers indicated that to date <br /> no permits have been required. Ms. Wyland explained that the State Building Code as well as <br /> the size of each sign are determinate factors in attaching a fee; but that she was not aware of the <br /> amounts. <br /> Council Member Neal indicated that he had reviewed the Ordinance, and asked about its <br /> suggested penalties. Attorney Hawkins clarified that the $700 fine set forth in the Ordnance <br /> represents the maximum penalty upon conviction that a court could impose, not a civil penalty <br /> that can be imposed by the City. <br /> After discussion of the number and size of signs placed around the City, Mayor Landers stated <br /> that although it is not clear what formal action should be taken, residents have complained and <br /> have expressed frustration with being governed by a Council whose candidates don't abide by the <br /> City's ordinances. <br /> Council Member Lyden asked that the Council return to the agenda for this evening, and that <br /> perhaps all political signs should be abolished. Mayor Landers explained that previous <br /> investigation had revealed that abolition of signs entirely is unconstitutional, but that he agreed <br /> that the Council should discuss this issue at the end of the established agenda. <br /> Council Member Neal stated that he is formally against the garbage collection in spite of the <br /> positions of the balance of the Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.