My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/02/1998 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1998 Park Board Packets
>
02/02/1998 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 1:11:51 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 3:38:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
02/02/1998
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 27, 1997 <br /> Mr. Schumacher added that historically business expansions have resulted in requiring utility <br /> connection due to intensified utility use. <br /> Tom Ramsden of Lino Lakes Blacktop stated that the proposed addition would enhance the <br /> property as well as the Lino Lakes Industrial Park, and that they plan to connect to utilities either <br /> from Lilac Street or Apollo Drive,whichever is most feasible. <br /> Mayor Landers asked at what point sprinklers are required. Ms. Wyland indicated that the limit <br /> is approximately 3,000 square feet; and that the fire chief reviews all submittals,making the final <br /> determination. <br /> Council Member Kuether verified that the reason for the expansion is for storage and office <br /> space. <br /> Council Member Kuether moved to approve the Lino Lakes Blacktop, Inc. conditional use <br /> permit. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Consideration of a Minor Subdivision Request;James Speiser,441-and 453 Birch Street- <br /> Ms. Wyland explained that Mr. Speiser and his daughter,Jill Paulus, are requesting a minor <br /> subdivision that would allow for a 1.2-acre parcel containing the existing homestead to be split <br /> from a 21.4+acre parcel at 441 Birch Street. The 21.4 acres is currently farmed by Mr. Speiser. <br /> The property is currently zoned R-1 and indicated as residential on the Comprehensive Plan; <br /> however, it is not currently within the MUSA and Mr. Speiser has indicated that he is not <br /> interested in development at this time. The 21.4 acres, however, could be developed residentially <br /> at some future date. Utilities are available from Birch Street to serve a future development. <br /> Ordinance No. 93 - 18 provides: <br /> Habitable single family homes constructed prior to July 13, 1992 may <br /> reduce their lot size to a minimum of one (1) acre if the balance of the <br /> property results in a parcel of ten(10) acres ... <br /> Staff recommended approval of this minor subdivision, but commented that the existing <br /> outbuildings will be considered preexisting nonconforming uses and,therefore, if destroyed by <br /> more than 75%will not be allowed to be rebuilt. As a 1.2-acre parcel,the newly created lot <br /> would be allowed a total of 2,020 square feet of accessory buildings. The site currently contains <br /> 4,300 square feet of accessory buildings. <br /> Ms. Wyland stated that there will be no park dedication fee, as no new dwelling units are <br /> proposed. Should the larger parcel ever develop,park dedication will be required at that time. <br /> Council Member Bergeson asked if the portion on Birch Street not containing a residence <br /> contains sufficient frontage to accommodate a residence in the future. Ms. Wyland indicated that <br /> sufficient frontage exists for a residence or a roadway. <br /> Council Member Lyden asked how much larger the parcel would need to be to make the <br /> outbuildings consistent with the ordinance requirement. Ms. Wyland stated 10 or more. <br /> However, the property is zoned R-1, so that provision is not applicable. She added that the back <br /> of the lot is heavily screened with trees, and should not pose a problem for future development. <br /> Council Member Lyden clarified that at this time the Council is only being asked to consider a <br /> minor subdivision under Ordinance No. 93 - 18. Ms. Wyland responded in the affirmative. �-' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.