My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/05/1998 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1998 Park Board Packets
>
10/05/1998 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:46:34 PM
Creation date
7/23/2021 10:08:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
10/05/1998
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning&Zoning Board <br /> September 9, 1998 <br /> Page 9 <br /> Chair Schaps stated the park is in the same place. Mr. Brixius noted the park had not <br /> been placed on the previous plat. <br /> Chair Schaps stated the revised plat is not consistent with the desires of the Park Board or <br /> the Planning&Zoning Board's recommendations. Mr. Brixius verified that the revised <br /> plat is not consistent with the Planning& Zoning Board's recommendations. <br /> Chair Schaps stated a number of things have not been done to the revised plat. He noted <br /> they may have not been done due to a lack of time. <br /> Mr. Johnson stated that the tree preservation is crucial to the layout. He indicated he <br /> would like to see a tree preservation plan and talk to the City Forester and Environmental <br /> Board. <br /> Mr. Dunn stated that he feels uncomfortable with moving forward at this time. They <br /> have given the applicant more time to meet the requirements for land acquisition. They <br /> have given specific guidance to the applicant that has been ignored. He stated he feels it <br /> is mandatory for the applicant to meet with the Park Board before coming back to the <br /> Planning&Zoning Board. He stated he is not opposed to the project he just does not <br /> believe it is ready. <br /> Mr. Corson stated the trees are a big issue. He expressed concern regarding a macro scale <br /> and staff viewing it on a micro scale. He suggested identifying each lot and each tree to <br /> be saved on each lot. Mr. Brixius stated staff has not given the project that consideration. <br /> Staff has looked at design. He stated he is hesitant to recommend approval of the <br /> application. <br /> Mr. Corson suggested looking into a tree preservation plan and perhaps having a <br /> presentation made to the Board regarding this issue. Mr. Brixius stated that a <br /> recommendation for approval could include comments from the City Forester and <br /> Environmental Board. <br /> Mr. Jackson stated the City does do a micro scale view of subdivisions by addresses. Mr. <br /> Asleson does visit the sites and determine which spots require tree preservation. The <br /> process is very effective. <br /> Mr. Mike Quigly, Gor-em LLC, came forward and stated he felt it is not fair to say they <br /> have ignored the Board's recommendations. He stated they have gone overboard in <br /> responding in a timely manner. Some areas regarding the recommendations are not in his <br /> control. When the property is platted it will meet all the City Ordinances. <br /> Chair Schaps asked if Mr. Quigly has met with the Park Board and received a <br /> ^ recommendation from them. Mr. Quigly indicated he has not met with the Park Board. <br /> The Park Board has asked for a 3 acre parcel of park land within the plat. The Park <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.