Laserfiche WebLink
Planning&Zoning Board <br /> September 9, 1998 <br /> Page 10 <br /> Board did not indicate the parcel had to be in the south property area. He stated he did try <br /> to meet with the Park Director. It was indicated that the park is in the hands of a park <br /> consultant. <br /> Chair Schaps stated he believes the preliminary plat should not go anywhere until the <br /> park has been placed. <br /> Mr. DeGardner, Park Director, stated the Park Board is interested in a 3 acre parcel of <br /> land. The Park Board is open to locate the park anywhere that it fits into the <br /> development. It must border the south end of the development if future expansion of the <br /> park is desired. <br /> Chair Schaps asked if any residents have approached the developer regarding the park. <br /> Mr. Quigly indicated that no residents have contacted him. He did speak with Mr. <br /> Latondra, an attorney for one of the property owners. <br /> Chair Schaps stated that he is concerned there will be no ball fields within the park. Mr. <br /> Quigly stated that is not the concern of the residents of Clearwater Creek. Those <br /> residents are more interested in a nature park. He stated he received that information <br /> based on a survey that was taken. <br /> Chair Schaps indicated he would like to see the survey. He stated he frequently hears <br /> Lino Lakes residents complain about the lack of ball fields within the City. <br /> Mr. DeGardner stated he has heard from five residents who would prefer an active <br /> neighborhood park. <br /> Chair Schaps stated the members of the Planning &Zoning Board are disappointed. He <br /> stated the revised preliminary plat is elusive. He stated there are too many holes in the <br /> report. <br /> Mr. Dunn stated the applicant should be given more time to reconstruct with staff and <br /> meet with the Park Board again. If the neighbors in the area do not want a park, the City <br /> must deal with that. He suggested the applicant work with staff again to resolve all the <br /> issues. <br /> Mr. DeGardner stated the applicant does not need to meet with the Park Board again. <br /> The bottom line is the Park Board would like 3 acres of land for park space. If the <br /> developer is able to locate the 3 acre parcel with a future expansion area of the park he <br /> will approve it himself. <br /> Chair Schaps asked if Mr. Quigly has a problem with fixing other recommendations by <br /> the October, 1998, meeting. Mr. Quigly indicated that will not be a problem. <br />