My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/02/1999 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
1999 Park Board Packets
>
08/02/1999 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:25:52 PM
Creation date
7/23/2021 11:22:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
08/02/1999
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 12, 1999 <br /> responsible for the property. He advised it is not a common problem as residents most often <br /> want to take care of the property. The City can detail how it wants the open space maintained. <br /> Mayor Sullivan asked if the City can establish an escrow to cover any City maintenance costs <br /> and to cover any costs associated with City action to enforce the contract. Mr. Hawkins stated he <br /> would have to investigate the process of setting up an escrow situation. It is possible the City <br /> could levy assessments to cover the costs of cleaning up neglected areas. There will be a <br /> mechanism in place for the homeowners association to collect a fee from the homeowners for <br /> maintenance. <br /> Council Member Lyden stated he supports the option of the City owning and managing the open <br /> space for the good of the City. Conflicts and certain issues will be avoided if the City owns the <br /> property. <br /> Mr. Asleson stated he referred to 1995 figures regarding the mainte=a' <br /> n materials. <br /> The cost is approximately$72.00 per year,per household, after the tall a That <br /> R <br /> figure includes maintenance and labor. <br /> Council Member Neal asked about the possibility of the, om�efs not laying an association <br /> fee. Mr. Smyser stated the homeowners association can p lien on the residents property. <br /> F <br /> Council Member Lyden asked about the phasmgachedul He stated MUSA is not an issue for <br /> the first phase. He indicated he supports tale rezdwa, phasing. He asked at what point is it <br /> responsible to open the next phase-for"bwld—' <br /> -77 <br /> Mr. Smyser advised the rule`vt'll involve the number of building permits allowed <br /> each year. Them <br /> tea" b " f permits issued in 1999 will be 75. The maximum number <br /> �# _ <br /> issued in 2000 will be the -`'' 2001, 45 permits will be issued. In 2002, the remainder of <br /> building perms ll be > ed to complete the development. <br /> Y <br /> Council Membei L- den stated that typically once a preliminary plat is approved,the final plat <br /> must be approve f it is the same. He asked if this preliminary plat is approved,can the final <br /> plat be denied. Mr. Hawkins advised the number of building permits issued can be limited if it <br /> is a condition of approval. <br /> Mayor Sullivan stated she cannot support the project if 25%of it is cut off. It is expected that the <br /> Comprehensive Plan will be approved. She indicated she is very uncomfortable approving only <br /> 75%of a project if the Plan is not approved. She stated she does understand and shares the <br /> MUSA concern. She stated the project is acceptable. However, she stated she would have rather <br /> seen all the information before approval. Other issues must be resolved immediately. She added <br /> she believes the project is a good project. <br /> Mayor Sullivan stated the following conditions need to be considered: <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.