My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/04/1991 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1991 Park Board Packets
>
02/04/1991 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2021 10:03:48 AM
Creation date
7/23/2021 3:23:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
02/04/1991
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
preserving small natural areas at the time of construction is <br />of paramount importance. This is not to downplay the <br />importance of landscaping sites with transplants as Kaplan <br />notes that birds can sing in small as well as large trees. <br />Kaplan's main finding, however, is that the arrangement of <br />the pieces of nature is the most important consideration in <br />providing neighborhood satisfaction. In particular, Kaplan's <br />research showed that: <br />By distributing open space in closer proximity to the <br />residential clusters and by making the clusters smaller, <br />the existing open space can be made to serve residents <br />far more effectively. <br />Certainly the city's natural environment provides it with <br />opportunities not available to other places. However these <br />opportunities can be lost without considerable attention to <br />site planning and to those city ordinances dealing with <br />amenities. <br />As Kaplan's Ann Arbor research showed place satisfaction was <br />achieved with skilled use of the natural environment. Again, <br />in those instances where the open space was unusable or where <br />the parking lots were sterile, residents were not as content. <br />i,.N Lino Lakes will probably become one of the fastest growing <br />communities in the metro area's north side. To -guarantee <br />future neighborhood satisfaction and the proper use of <br />Kaplan's pieces of nature the city should continue to review <br />development plan and subdivisions with goals of preserving <br />wetlands and wooded areas - even if only "pieces of nature." <br />GOALS <br />Goals are very broad and general statements meant only to <br />guide the planning process. Policies are more definitive <br />position statements meant to further direct city activities <br />that will lead to implementation of the adopted goals. <br />Policies can become important guidelines in routine matters <br />as they provide direction in such daily tasks as plat and <br />site plan review. They also are useful where ordinances and <br />other implementation tools are unclear or open to <br />interpretation. <br />Standards are even more specific statements of actions to be <br />undertaken by the city. Standards also are the result of <br />deliberations choosing from many different options that might <br />implement the goals and policies. Actually then standards <br />constitute a list of detailed recommendations for action. <br />They are the final quantifiable product of the planning <br />process. In the section outlining the plan, the "standards" <br />are called "recommendations." <br />This brief chapter of the plan is meant to list the goals for <br />�Y <br />Page 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.