My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/01/1995 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1995 Park Board Packets
>
05/01/1995 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2021 12:13:05 PM
Creation date
8/6/2021 9:41:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
05/01/1995
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> PARK BOARD MEETING <br /> MONDAY, APRIL 3, 1995 <br /> This area according to Jeff Schoenbauer was probably the most <br /> difficult to achieve the linear trail corridor concept. About <br /> the only passable location for this corridor was through the air <br /> park traversing at a northeast angle. It is thought that at this <br /> time the best opportunity to achieve a linear park trail in this <br /> area of the city would be the loop segment 5, 6, 7, and 8, and to <br /> connect into this via transportation trails along 4th Avenue. <br /> John Johnson, representative for Gary Uhde and Jeff Schoenbauer <br /> were present to give additional information and answer questions <br /> the Park Board may have. <br /> Ken wanted to know when the road adjacent to the park would be <br /> going in. John responded between the years 1996 and 2000. Pam <br /> asked the price range of the homes that would be going in Phase <br /> 1. John said between $110, 000 and $130, 000 with upper bracket <br /> homes in later phases. Amy questioned why the air park wanted <br /> homes built near the air park. John said the air park could <br /> receive association dues from people to help maintain the air <br /> park. <br /> After additional questions and discussion the Park Board decided <br /> not to take action on this development concept because of the <br /> uncertainties concerning the provision of trails with respect to <br /> wetland issues and with particular concerns for pedestrian access <br /> to the dedicated park area from Phase 1. There was also concern <br /> for the placement of the required transportation trail along <br /> Lilac Street to the Park, as well as future trail corridor access <br /> to Carl Street in proposed Phase 5 . <br /> The Park Board resolved to support the developers proposal for <br /> creative design and the use of berms to traverse wet areas <br /> through correspondence with the Watershed Board. The Park Board <br /> will take action on this development dedication issue when <br /> definitive questions concerning trails are answered. <br /> It was recommended, that at a staff level, a letter of support be <br /> written to the Rice Creek Water Shed District. Marty said he <br /> would take care of this and fax it to the RCWSD. <br /> PLAYGROUND INSPECTION: Marty said he is a certified National <br /> Playground Safety Inspector and has shared this information with <br /> our maintenance staff. Mike Hoffman did a hazard rating on the <br /> equipment in the parks and City Hall Park was ranked highest with <br /> a rating of 50 percent. He then went over the audit summary that <br /> was done. Marty suggested that the Park Board make a <br /> recommendation to replace old pieces of equipment over the years. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.