My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/03/1995 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1995 Park Board Packets
>
04/03/1995 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 1:28:25 PM
Creation date
8/6/2021 9:46:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
04/03/1995
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�. South Athletic Complex Site <br /> City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br /> the first criteria can be met is a difficult analysis. The <br /> key issue is whether the site can be brought into the MUSA <br /> thereby giving it access to sanitary sewer that would allow <br /> development into urban size lots. We are informed by <br /> officials at the City of Lino Lakes that there are no current <br /> plans to expand the MUSA to include the subject property. <br /> Bringing the site into the MUSA would require a petition from <br /> the property owner to the City, a petition from the City to <br /> the Metropolitan Council and a favorable response. Also, the <br /> City's comprehensive plan would need to be amended and the <br /> site zoned to the desired use. <br /> At this point, it is our opinion that the likelihood of <br /> these things happening on a current basis is remote. Absent <br /> an actual attempt to bring about single family development on <br /> the site, it is impossible to say with certainty that it could <br /> not occur. Much of the.required action is political and it is <br /> impossible to predict the outcome of such proceedings. <br /> The alternative uses available to the site that could be <br /> considered to be a highest and best use are many and are <br /> included as allowed uses in the enclosed copy of the zoning <br /> ordinance. We have considered each of the these allowed uses. <br /> Each of the potential uses, in our opinion, amounts to no more <br /> than an interim use pending expansion of utilities to the site <br /> and allowing urban density single family residences. Given <br /> ^ its size, it is highly unlikely that it is a viable single <br /> Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.