My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/22/1995 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1995 Park Board Packets
>
02/22/1995 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2021 12:53:02 PM
Creation date
8/6/2021 10:15:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
02/22/1995
Park Bd Meeting Type
Joint
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r - <br /> Page 2 <br /> In the vacinity of Birchwood Acres,Pine Ridge,Park Grove,and Reshanau Estates,the only <br /> r^ existing parks are Shanendoah Park and Rice Lake Elementary;however,the school has priority <br /> over the use of its playground and playing fields. Marty said it is very apparent to the City that <br /> another park is needed. Due to this need,some of the Park Grove Park space has been given high <br /> enough priority to get the necessary funding for being tilled, flattened,graded,and seeded with low <br /> maintenance turf by the Fall of'94. <br /> Marty showed the City's potential plan for the Park Grove Park space,which totals 10 acres. Five <br /> acres are currently available,with 5 additional acres being designated park space as soon as the <br /> farmer is ready to sell the land to the City. The plan maps out where things could go such as a <br /> playground and picnic areas(which are on the currently available acreage),informal softball field, <br /> hockey/skating rink,20-car parking lot,connecting paths,and other structures. It also shows <br /> where low-lying areas are that wouldn't be developed,as well as treed areas and possible <br /> landscaping. Meeting attendees received copies of this plan,and Marty said we were welcome to <br /> come up with ideas for modification. We were able to draw in streets and cul de sacs that run <br /> along the park to get a better idea of its layout. <br /> Terry emphasized that residents that live along the park boundaries would be especially interested <br /> in the park plans since parts of it would basically be in their back yards. We also expressed <br /> concern that we avoid having the park used in such a way that traffic would be a problem for area <br /> residents. Marty assured us that the softball space does not lend itself to being used for Little <br /> League or other organized sports games because of its size. He said that is why the City's"plan <br /> labels it as an"informal"playing field,even though there are no limitations on developing it into a <br /> good quality softball.field with a backstop, a quality infield surface,etc. Also,the park space has <br /> limited space for a parking lot(20"cars or so);nevertheless,residents.stated that they still wanted <br /> some reassurance that the park would not be used in such a way that the parking lot would be <br /> overfilled and-that people would park their.cars in front of residents'houses and that traffic would <br /> be at an undesirable level in the neighborhood. <br /> On the topic of park funding,Marty said approx.24%of our property"tax money goes.to the City, <br /> but only a small percentage goes to park/trail maintenance and development(approx.$173,000 <br /> were dedicated to parks for 1994). That money is currently being used to maintain 8-10 existing <br /> parks,develop and pave an extensive path system,and to start development on 6 parks(including <br /> the grading,etc.,of Park Grove Park). Given that the city is currently financially unable to pay for <br /> all park development,such as playground equipment,he named the following as possibilities for <br /> our neighborhoods to obtain the necessary funding to start development of our park: <br /> 1. A Referendum(i.e.,residents vote on whether we want to have an additional tax that <br /> specifically is designated for park development,but it is unclear whether Park Grove Park <br /> would specifically benefit from such a referendum) <br /> 2. City Park Board(we could appeal to the board for money and/or other assistance in <br /> constructing the park(labor),but there are no guarantees;the board meets on the 1st <br /> Monday of each month at 6:30 p.m. in City Hall at 1189 Main St.). In any case,we would <br /> need to get the board's approval for any park development plans/action.. <br /> 3. Appeal to local businesses to make donations(the 49 Club was mentioned, which has new <br /> owners land seems as though it would be interested in establishing more visibility) <br /> 4. Friends of the Park foundation(seemingly the most promising,according to Marty;more <br /> information on this foundation is described next). Meets the 3rd Mon.of each month. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.