Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />APPROVED <br />134 exists in the area and he wonders if a similar design could be a consideration. Mr. <br />135 Ruhland explained that his vision is individuality even with a row home development. <br />136 <br />137 Mayor Rafferty remarked that he has worked to be in tune with some of the facts — nearby <br />l38 Raven's Hollow is a PUD and it fits; that's the kind of development that would be more <br />139 acceptable for the neighbors he believes. He has historically tried to avoid anything less <br />140 than fifty foot lots. <br />141 <br />142 Councilmember Stoesz asked if a private drive would help this development; the council <br />143 also discussed the cukde-sac element. Planner Larsen explained that staff is actually <br />144 looking at some changes to the cul-de-sac ordinance (updating). <br />145 <br />146 Mr. Ruhland suggested that there will be information forthcoming, after they relook at the <br />147 project. <br />148 <br />149 3. Advisory Board Appointment — Environmental Board — Administrator Cotton <br />150 reviewed the written report. There are two openings however they do not expire at the <br />151 same time and one term expires at the end of this year. She noted two applicants <br />152 remaining from the last round of appointments and that those two applicants were <br />153 interviewed already. Beyond that, one new application has been received and that person <br />154 has not been interviewed. She reviewed options presented by staff. <br />155 <br />156 The council will interview all candidates prior to an upcoming council meeting <br />157 (September 13th or 27th). Terms may be changed to realignment and make them <br />158 appropriately scattered. <br />159 <br />160 4. Livable Communities Act Participation —Community Development Director <br />161 Groe a reviewed his staff report that outlines participation requirements and benefits. <br />162 Some grant eligibility is based on participation in this program. There are more upsides <br />163 than downsides. The City has been a participant since 1996 and dropped off last year <br />164 because the Comp Plan wasn't done. <br />165 <br />166 The council concurred that the matter will move forward to the council. <br />167 <br />168 5. 2022 Draft Budget and Tax Levy — Finance Director Lynch noted Page 2 of the <br />169 annual budget as it shows changes from the council's first discussion to tonight. Staff <br />170 has brought the budget down to a 41.0 tax rate as requested by the council. Changes that <br />171 would bring the budget to that level are noted; some are changes in funding source (to <br />172 reserves). She noted attachments relating to recreation program funding ($52,000) that <br />173 would bring the tax rate to 41.209 and an explanation of the phase in for a new fire duty <br />174 crew. Ms. Lynch did note that updated tax capacity numbers have not been received from <br />t75 the county and that could mean some change to the numbers. <br />176 <br />177 Administrator Cotton noted areas that could fluctuate due to estimates such as health <br />178 insurance rates. <br />4 <br />