My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/13/2021 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2021
>
10/13/2021 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2021 10:43:45 AM
Creation date
10/8/2021 4:08:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
10/13/2021
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning&Zoning Board <br /> September 8,2021 <br /> Page 9 <br /> the parcel is not developed within that time period, ownership will revert back to the <br /> City. In 2007, when the City was considering selling the lot, the decision was made <br /> to not allow a convenience store in that location so as to not compete with existing <br /> businesses in town. As the land owner, the City has the sole discretion to place such <br /> conditions on parcels. <br /> Mr. Reinert commented the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council does not <br /> approve businesses because a business can fail within a year and a new business then <br /> would occupy the space. Rather, he said, the Board and City Council approves <br /> buildings. <br /> Chair Tralle then asked about the approval of G Will Liquors. He questioned if the <br /> Board approved the building,but not the liquor store. He noted a license was issued <br /> to the company as well. <br /> Mr. Reinert reiterated G Will Liquors could have went out of business in six months <br /> and some other business entity could have then moved in. <br /> Mr. Vojtech said he utilizes mini storage. He stated, when he wanted a unit, he called <br /> several companies around Lino Lakes and Columbus and no one had an opening. He <br /> commented mini self-storage units are clearly utilized by residents. He said he is in <br /> favor of implementing a moratorium for mini self-storage. <br /> Mr. Root recommended the City review the current zoning ordinance to ensure they <br /> have particular uses in the right locations even if there is development pressure now. <br /> He said he doubts the development pressure will disappear within a year, but even if <br /> it does, the City will have the right conditions and standards in place. <br /> Chair Tralle declared the Public Hearing open at 7:30 p.m. <br /> There was no one present for the Public Hearing. <br /> Mr. Vojtech made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing at 7:31 p.m. Motion was <br /> supported by Mr. Wipperfurth. Motion carried 6—0. Chair Tralle abstained. <br /> Board Discussion <br /> Mr. Wipperfurth commented if there was a lot of business interest in mini self-storage <br /> units, developers would be present speaking out against the notion of a moratorium. <br /> Mr. Reinert asked if the moratorium is established for one year and the City is able to <br /> approve the zoning ordinance and get through the public hearings within nine months, <br /> would the City then approach the Board and ask to lift the moratorium early. <br /> DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.