Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 2 <br />Administrator with everything on her plate is ideal. The mayor remarked that he has 44 <br />come to a place of supporting the new position; he sees it’s needed. 45 <br /> 46 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if there is process for considering employee compensation 47 <br />ratings regularly and not on an immediate change basis. Administrator Cotton suggested 48 <br />that if changes occur and the City doesn’t recognize them in the system, the system 49 <br />becomes less accurate; she believes a new position or a change in job responsibilities 50 <br />should trigger a review. Councilmember Stoesz asked if, for example, the Public 51 <br />Services Director position will be reviewed because he has added responsibility with 52 <br />handling the YMCA building; Ms. Cotton explained the criteria for reviewing a position. 53 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if the communications individual would be the person 54 <br />representing the City if there were something like a 9:00 p.m. public safety incident. 55 <br />Public Safety Director Swenson said it would depend on the incident and communication 56 <br />duties would possibly work down from Public Safety personnel to communications. 57 <br /> 58 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if the communications person would be attending the North 59 <br />Metro TV Board meetings. Ms. Cotton said probably not but she sees the position 60 <br />working closely with North Metro on communication collaboration. 61 <br /> 62 <br />Councilmember Ruhland said he shares some of the concern expressed about moving up 63 <br />another position. He requested and received information on the salary level for the 64 <br />current Human Resources Manager. Ms. Cotton provided information on how the 65 <br />implementation of the Keystone system affected some positions. Councilmember 66 <br />Ruhland noted the decrease in the point level assigned to the communications position 67 <br />from what was anticipated from initial discussions about the position. 68 <br /> 69 <br />Councilmember Cavegn asked if there would be cost savings by hiring two part time 70 <br />individuals to fill the one full time position. Administrator Cotton said that option was 71 <br />discussed and staff felt that a full time position would bring a higher quality; there would 72 <br />also be some question about how two positions transition to each other. Ms. Cotton 73 <br />pointed out the possible savings would be limited to the cost of health care. 74 <br /> 75 <br />Administrator Cotton noted that through investigating, she’s determined that there are 76 <br />only three cities of this City’s comparable group that do not have a position like this in 77 <br />place. 78 <br /> 79 <br />Councilmember Ruhland asked how the supervision will actually function. 80 <br />Administrator Cotton explained that there would be policies and procedures that guide 81 <br />functions and approvals. Councilmember Ruhland asked what specific supervision 82 <br />functions would occur and Ms. Cotton pointed out that performance review would be one 83 <br />function; she added that it is a new position and would therefore will require more 84 <br />intensive supervision and development. 85 <br /> 86 <br />Mayor Rafferty noted the importance of considering stress factors so that the City doesn’t 87 <br />experience a revolving door with key positions. 88