Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 1 <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 <br />MINUTES 2 <br /> 3 <br />DATE : June 7, 2021 4 <br />TIME STARTED : 5:00 p.m. 5 <br />TIME ENDED : 8:20 p.m. 6 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, Lyden, Ruhland, 7 <br /> Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty 8 <br />MEMBERS ABSENT : None 9 <br /> 10 <br />Staff members present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton; Finance Director Hannah 11 <br />Lynch; Director of Public Services Rick DeGardner; Director of Public Safety John 12 <br />Swenson; Community Development Director Michael Grochala; City Clerk Julie Bartell 13 <br /> 14 <br />1. (5:00 pm) Final Report on Recreation and Aquatic Center Feasibility Study 15 <br />by Isaac Sports Group – Community Development Director Grochala introduced the 16 <br />subject matter including the background on the former YCMA facility (see written staff 17 <br />report). He introduced consultants Stu Isaac and Duane Proell, who gave a presentation 18 <br />using PowerPoint (on file) that included information on the following: 19 <br /> The process and methodology used for the study; 20 <br /> Goals, opportunities and vision for the community rec center; 21 <br /> Programing: immediate and long term; 22 <br /> Programming, more specifically: 23 <br /> - for older and active adults; 24 <br /> - fitness (including drawing in outside providers); 25 <br /> - aquatics; 26 <br /> - therapy, rehab and special needs programming; 27 <br /> - learn to swim and water safety; 28 <br /> Programming, rec center schedule model; 29 <br /> Potential Program Outsourcing, finding the right program partners criteria; 30 <br /> Possible Opportunities for Outsourced Programming: 31 <br /> - swim lesson 32 <br /> - fitness program provider; 33 <br /> Membership Model (three different scenarios of YMCA fees); found that 34 <br />60% of Y rates was the sweet spot; 35 <br /> Recommended Membership and User Fees (table); 36 <br /> Operating and Financial Goals; 37 <br /> Management Models (City managed, total outsourced; hybrid options); 38 <br /> Re-Opening and Start Up Costs (city management option); 39 <br /> Financial Operating Analysis (city management and hybrid option); 40 <br /> Year 3: City managed vs. hybrid model (cost estimate table); (also showed 41 <br />expense and revenue estimates for year 1 and year 2) 42 <br /> Main Sources of Revenue; 43 <br /> Main Sources of Costs; 44 <br /> Long Term Accrued Deficit; 45