Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 3 <br />programming and Mr. Isaac said that is anticipated and has been considered in areas of 91 <br />the budget (equipment). Councilmember Ruhland said he is leaning toward the hybrid 92 <br />model; he asked for the consultants’ professional recommendation on the best option. 93 <br />Mr. Proell said the hybrid program makes sense to him; his experience tells him that the 94 <br />city managed program would be a longer and harder road; he added that there are very 95 <br />viable partnerships available to the City. 96 <br /> 97 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked about the child watch program; how will that be priced and 98 <br />how important is it. Mr. Isaac said it is a service provided with revenue not covering 99 <br />costs; most facilities provide it as a service for their members. Councilmember Stoesz 100 <br />asked if the City’s insurance through the LMC would cover a facility; Mr. Isaac said it 101 <br />would normally be covered through the City’s regular insurance channels. 102 <br /> 103 <br />Community Development Director Grochala remarked that this project has turned over all 104 <br />leafs – the study has been well developed and the options presented are viable. He noted 105 <br />that the consultant will be present for the council meeting (June 28th). The report 106 <br />includes a lot of positives, the facility is a good one and there are opportunities to make it 107 <br />a continuing asset to the community. 108 <br /> 109 <br />Finance Director Lynch concurred with the completeness of the report and noted that the 110 <br />financial information is appropriate to the question. 111 <br /> 112 <br />Public Services Director DeGardner said directors have spent a lot of time looking at 113 <br />alternatives and have looked at how a facility could be merged into the City structure, all 114 <br />based on how the council would like to proceed. 115 <br /> 116 <br />The mayor offered thanks to Mr. Isaac and Mr. Proell for the report. If the council has 117 <br />additional questions, he suggests they pose them to staff previous to further formal review 118 <br />on June 28th. 119 <br />The meeting was recessed at 6:50 p.m. to allow for a scheduled special council meeting. 120 <br /> 121 <br />2. Review 2020 Annual Audit Report – Finance Director Lynch explained that the 122 <br />City’s 2020 Annual Financial Report has been prepared by Redpath and Company and 123 <br />their representative, Andy Hering, was present to overview the findings and answer 124 <br />council questions. The council will be asked to accept the report at the June 14th Cit 125 <br />Council meeting. 126 <br /> 127 <br />Andy Hering, Redpath and Company, the City’s auditing firm, reviewed a PowerPoint 128 <br />presentation including information on the following: 129 <br /> Overview of report; 130 <br /> Results overview; 131 <br /> Audit process (schedule); 132 <br /> What do the auditors look for; 133 <br /> Where they look for data (journals and disbursements); 134 <br /> Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance (where they look); 135