Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> <br />b. Nature’s Refuge where PUD flexibility was granted for reduced right-of- <br />way width, reduced front structure setbacks and reduced pavement width <br />in exchange for minimizing impacts to rare and endangered species and <br />wetlands and protections of 60% open space and wetlands. <br /> <br />c. Watermark where PUD flexibility was granted from lot width/size <br />standards and building design standards in exchange for upholding the <br />City’s public values by creating a multi-functional open space greenway <br />corridor integrated with the stormwater conveyance system, wetland <br />management and trails when none exists today; providing life-cycle <br />housing opportunities, creating a master planned community from 12 <br />separate parcels and creating a high amenity built environment. <br /> <br />2. Modifying the purpose and intent to be clearer and more concise. <br /> <br />3. Expanding the list of desired public benefits to be evaluated with PUDs. <br /> <br />4. Creating a table to identify base development guidelines by zoning district along <br />with a reference to the base general provision standards. While staff historically <br />has included this base zoning reference as part of the analysis and noted this <br />district in the staff report, this change will provide more clarity. <br /> <br />5. Deleting unnecessary general requirements covered under other sections of the <br />Zoning or Subdivision Ordinance. <br /> <br />6. Moving rural residential PUD requirements to the Subdivision Ordinance to allow <br />it by right. These subdivisions will allow clustering of homes on smaller lots than <br />would typically be allowed in exchange for preservation of at least 50% of the <br />area as open space and compliance with additional conservation development <br />standards. <br /> <br />7. Modifying the open space performance standards to clarify how it is calculated <br />and designed in urban residential PUDs. <br /> <br />8. Creating a subsection for mixed-use PUD requirements which references the <br />residential, commercial and industrial PUD sections. <br /> <br />9. Creating an additional requirement for commercial and industrial PUDs to have <br />harmonious and integrated design for all buildings in the development. <br /> <br />10. Added a requirement that the developer hold a neighborhood meeting prior to <br />submittal of a PUD concept plan application. <br /> <br />11. Streamlined the submittal requirements to eliminate unnecessary requirements <br />and referencing standards from other sections of City Code rather than repeating <br />the standards. <br /> <br />12. Updating submittal procedures to match current city process.