Laserfiche WebLink
8 <br /> <br /> An extensive stormwater drainage study will be required to determine the purpose <br />of the ponding easement and what impacts vacating the easement may have on <br />adjacent properties. <br /> A stormwater management plan and erosion and sediment control plan in <br />accordance with City Ordinance Chapter 1011 shall be required. <br /> The 3 new houses and existing house shall hook up to municipal watermain and <br />sanitary sewer. <br /> Standard utility trunk, availability and Bisel amendment fees apply. <br /> Park dedication fee of $9,450 for 3 new lots is required. <br /> Landscape and buffer screens are required along Mustang Lane. <br /> See WSB City Engineer memo for additional comments. <br /> <br />Future land use applications may include: <br /> <br /> Rezoning <br /> Variances <br /> Preliminary Plat <br /> Drainage & Utility Easement Vacation <br /> Final Plat <br /> <br />PLANNING & ZONING BOARD <br /> <br />The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the concept plan on February 12, 2020. The <br />Board agreed the road and public utilities should be extended to the property line at this <br />time. Lot 1 and Lot 2 would then front the new road. Mr. Laden suggested a 30 foot street <br />setback for Lot 3 may be acceptable since older lots along Lilac Street are at 30 feet. Mr. <br />Root supported a possible amendment to City ordinance regarding road right-of-way and <br />setbacks for certain collector and arterial roads. <br /> <br />Mr. Joe Bonfe, applicant, requested the road and public utilities not be required due to <br />cost. He suggested possibly dedicating an outlot to City for future road right-of-way. He <br />stated his son was possibly going to move into the existing house at 87 Lilac Street and <br />didn’t see any issue with relocating the driveway to Mustang Lane. <br /> <br />REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION <br /> <br />Staff is requesting Council input regarding the proposed Concept Plan for 87 Lilac Street. <br />A concept plan does not require formal Council approval or denial via resolution. This is <br />only an informal review so the applicant can be advised of staff, Board and Council <br />comments. <br /> <br />The City’s review and comments on the concept plan’s relation to the Comprehensive <br />Plan and development regulations does not grant any rights to the applicant to develop <br />the property as depicted by the concept plan. <br /> <br /> <br />