My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04-06-2020 Council work Session Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2020
>
04-06-2020 Council work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2021 12:29:26 PM
Creation date
11/17/2021 11:24:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/06/2020
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />The City owns its own Cisco IP phones. In order to continue using these phones, we <br />would need to purchase a Cisco Unified Communications Manager server, Cisco voice <br />router, and a PRI or SIP connection through a local telco. The cost to continue with the <br />telephone system would be roughly $200,000. We simply couldn’t do it. The City would <br />be looking purchasing a less expensive phone system and going with another telephone <br />provider like Verizon. <br /> <br />The City owns its own physical cameras, but without Milestone VMS through Metro I- <br />Net, we would have to purchase our own video management server and associated <br />licensing and hardware support. The City also owns Arbitrator VPU’s and body worn <br />cameras. We would be responsible for purchasing our own Arbitrator server and <br />associated licensing and hardware support at an approximate cost of $40,000. <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />Option two and three would result in considerable cost to Lino Lakes. These costs are <br />difficult to calculate as there are so many aspects to consider. The most informed <br />estimate of annual costs if the Council chose another option is $300,000 to $350,000, <br />which does not include upfront capital costs of around $150,000. <br /> <br />We don’t know what another option would look like without a comprehensive analysis <br />based on IT services we currently receive from Metro I-Net. Because of the many <br />services provided by the City by Roseville, we are “highly entangled” with them. <br />Inasmuch as we’re dealing with wheels within wheels, staff would recommend hiring an <br />IT consultant to analyze the City’s needs and substantiate or verify the most cost effective <br />option for Lino Lakes. <br /> <br />A transition from I-Net is possible if that is the direction the Council wants to go. <br />However, it would come with significant cost, disruption, and time. We would need to <br />hire IT staff in a tough labor market. The pain level would be high. <br /> <br />It is staff’s contention that Metro I-Net is one of the best values for IT services that can <br />be found anywhere. It has provided Lino Lakes excellent 24/7 support and would <br />continue to do so under a joint powers arrangement. I have personally never had a <br />complaint about the service I’ve received nor has anyone complained to me. <br /> <br />Requested Council Direction <br /> <br />Consider joining other Metro I-Net agencies in establishing a joint powers agreement. <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />2020 Budget Summary <br />Descriptions of Metro I-Net Services Provided to Lino Lakes
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.