Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Katie Larsen <br />4/13/2020 <br />Page 3 <br />Nadeau Acres Engineering Review <br /> <br /> <br />During the public hearing held at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting on February 12, 2020 there were a <br />number of questions regarding the proposed developments’ stormwater management plan. Below is a summary <br />of findings and actions to address the questions: <br /> <br />• The site outlets to two private ditches, one in the northwest, and one to the north. There is also a small <br />area of the site that drains to the south. <br />• The proposed project is required to mitigate surface water and address water quality through City, <br />Watershed District and State Rules and Statues. This includes maintaining the existing rate or reducing <br />the rate of runoff from the site, and providing water quality treatment for the proposed <br />development. The project meets the City of Lino Lakes’ stormwater management requirements and <br />RCWD rules. RCWD approved a CAPROC on April 8, 2020. <br />o This project is proposing to reduce rates as detailed in the Stormwater Report, and will utilize <br />stormwater ponding for water quality treatment. The stormwater management plan <br />incorporates existing soils and time of concentrations to calculate the needed ponding systems <br />to mitigate the new impervious surfaces. <br />o The surface water from the new impervious surfaces will be accommodated through three new <br />ponds. Pond 200, located in the middle of the site, will pick up surface water from the south <br />portion of the site and direct it towards Pond 100. Pond 100 will pick up surface water from the <br />northwest portion of the site and discharge to the west to an existing private ditch. Pond 400 <br />will receive the remaining surface water and discharge to an existing ditch to the north. <br />o The design includes a standard outlet control structure with pipe outlet. An outlet control <br />structure is a device that holds water back in the proposed pond and then discharges it slowly <br />into the ditch so that the flow to the downstream ditch is less than the existing condition flow <br />into the ditch. <br />o The original design included an outlet pipe to the ditch. The applicant was unable to obtain an <br />easement for the outlet pipe to the ditch as required by the City and RCWD. The applicant <br />revised the design and enlarged the pond to provide additional storage and added a plunge <br />pool dissipater at the discharge location. <br />• Adjacent property owners expressed concerns over the s stormwater runoff from the site and the <br />downstream private ditches. Staff had multiple conversations and Zoom meetings with the property <br />owners to better understand their concerns and explain the existing and proposed conditions. This <br />included an onsite evaluation, reviewing topographic data, record plans, survey, and incorporation of <br />the NorthPointe development drainage plan. The downstream systems appear to be working correctly <br />and the NorthPointe development has reduced the surface water flow to the subwatershed in question. <br />We will continue to work the property owners and provide information and findings. <br />o The adjacent private ditch owners are responsible to perpetuate existing runoff rates and are <br />to maintain the ditch flow through their property. Staff reviewed private ditch requirements with <br />the City Attorney and RCWD staff. <br />o 2019 was a record year for rainwater in Minneapolis-St. Paul area according to the Minnesota <br />DNR Year to Date Precipitation Chart. Soil saturation in the fall of 2019 was similar to a spring <br />snow melt condition where typically the fall is a dryer condition. These conditions have led to <br />standing water due to soil saturation and higher flows in conveyance systems. <br />o We are working with one of the downstream property owner to complete culvert maintenance <br />on their property. <br />• In addition, we are having the developer verify the downstream conditions to confirm their assumptions. <br />Comments: <br />1. Pond 100 is discharging to a private ditch, which should be coordinated with the Rice Creek <br />Watershed District and the City of Centerville. <br />Discharge location is being verified with developer. <br />Plunge Pool Energy Dissipator has been added to discharge location per discussion with watershed <br />district and City. See comment 9 regarding the plunge pool energy dissipator design. <br />2. Sections of the storm sewer are located directly beneath the overhead powerlines and should be <br />relocated. <br />Revised. <br />The storm sewer needs to be offset at least 20’ from the proposed structure on Lot 5 Block 4. <br />3. Adjust storm sewer that currently runs through Outlot C so that it follows the curb. <br />Revised. Note that in order to force storm sewer to follow the curb for its entirety in this lot, 2 additional <br />structures would be required. Catch basin moved further north to reduce the assumed future easement <br />in a potential front yard. <br />4. The storm sewer that is part of the rear yard drainage system for Lots 6 & 7 of Block 2 is too close to <br />the future houses. Applicant shall move the storm sewer to the west while maintaining a 20-ft offset <br />from the overhead power line.