Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 3 <br />City Engineer Hankee explained that the drainage areas to pond remain the same. She 83 <br />doesn’t have the numbers tonight on volume change but the way the pond works is that 84 <br />you have acres of impervious surface being added that will cause the water to flow more 85 <br />quickly; it mo ves to a pond and it leaves the site from there; a larger pond lowers the rate. 86 <br />Ms. Broussard asked at what point the water starts moving toward the dissipater Ms. 87 <br />Hankee explained at what point the water would flow from the pond (as indicated in the 88 <br />plans). Ms. Broussard wondered if they will have constant flow to their property. 89 <br />City Planner Larsen noted, regarding the utility staging, that the property would be 90 <br />included in the 2025 to 2030 area. 91 <br />Councilmember Cavegn noted the issue of erosion that lays with the property owner. He 92 <br />sees that as a burden and perhaps unfair. He wonders if there are other options. City 93 <br />Engineer Hankee explained that the applicant has met the requirements for storm water 94 <br />management; the runoff rates to that site are being reduced. She wants to better 95 <br />understand the concern. Councilmember Cavegn explained that there is a large amount of 96 <br />water flowing to a certain amount of property and he believes that the concentration of the 97 <br />flow will cause erosion. Ms. Hankee said the rate will be controlled with the ponding 98 <br />system whereas currently it would come all at once; there shouldn’t be a large surface 99 <br />flow. Councilmember Cavegn asked if there are currently erosion issues and Mr. Vickers 100 <br />explained the current situation and his concern about where the dirt will land and he 101 <br />believes that it will be in the ditch and in turn the water in the ditch will be elevated. The 102 <br />impact will be on the yield of crops planted on his property. It isn’t right for him to incur 103 <br />the cost of maintenance. Ms. Hankee explained that the dissipater will take out the 104 <br />sediment, noting that is what has happened in fact in the NorthPointe area. Community 105 <br />Development Director Grochala said he believes the concern is erosion caused from the 106 <br />dissipater to the ditch and will that cause erosion; he believes there can be information 107 <br />provided to ensure that isn’t a problem. Mr. Grochala suggested an easement in a certain 108 <br />area to the City of Lino Lakes to ensure that maintenance occurs. Ms. Broussard 109 <br />explained that any easement has to receive consent of Xcel Energy as well as the 110 <br />watershed district; past that, she thinks that something they would discuss. 111 <br />Mayor Rafferty noted that the developer has an engineer providing information that is 112 <br />reviewed by the City’s engineer. Staff is suggesting an easement agreement to ensure 113 <br />certain maintenance. He is interested in seeing the resident’s concerns addressed. 114 <br />Community Development Director Grochala said staff will explore the easement and 115 <br />address the residents’ concerns. 116 <br />Councilmember Lyden wondered if this development would be a better quality of 117 <br />neighborhood if it were zoned R1x; his personal preference is that. Also, on the park, he 118 <br />doesn’t think it’s realistic for kids to travel across 20th Street to a park. His suggestion is, 119 <br />in the first staging area, leave a couple of pads as open space initially and until 120 <br />development of a park. Another concern is that cul de sacs are limited in length by city 121 <br />ordinance and he believes this development is in violation. Mayor Rafferty noted that the 122