Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 9 <br />approximate 5% increase in the City’s taxable value, resulting in a preliminary estimate of 338 <br />a levy increase of $530,000 without raising the tax rate. She noted factors that will have 339 <br />to be considered moving forward to budget consideration (i.e. past use of reserves, 340 <br />inflat ionary increases, personnel changes). This is an opportunity for the council to 341 <br />inform staff of any priorities and strategies for the coming year’s budget, noting that a 342 <br />previously planned strategy session was cancelled due to the current emergency. 343 <br />The council discussed briefly the general fund reserve and one time funds that were 344 <br />utilized for the 2020 budget. 345 <br /> 346 <br />The council concurred that they would plan to have a special session on July 27th 347 <br />following the regular council meeting. 348 <br />10. 2021 – 2024 Five-Year Street Reconstruction Plan – Community Development 349 <br />Director Grochala reviewed the three elements of the City’s pavement management plan – 350 <br />preventive management (funded through the City’s annual budget), preservation and 351 <br />rehabilitation (annual overlay projects) and street reconstruction (bigger projects – full 352 <br />reconstruction, funded through bonding). He is addressing that third element. He 353 <br />explained that the City normally undertakes a project every three years (next one being in 354 <br />2021). In order to use street reconstruction bonds for these projects, plans must be made 355 <br />ahead that allows for required process. A public hearing would be required by July 1 of 356 <br />this year. He noted a plan currently under consideration for 2021 and 2024 (2024 would 357 <br />be revisited). The recommendations are based on pavement ratings and specifically on 358 <br />streets that are found on the low end of the rating scale. He added that the streets 359 <br />presented may not be possible to accomplish in the two projects but that will be decided as 360 <br />costs become clearer. He is requesting authorization to proceed with the staff work 361 <br />necessary to bring additional information forward in June. 362 <br />Mayor Reinert asked staff, what is the root of the concern that everything can’t be done 363 <br />and Mr. Grochala explained that it comes down to funds and, with that in mind, he will be 364 <br />working with the City E ngineer to make sure costs presented to the public for each project 365 <br />are as accurate as possible. The mayor asked that the council receive a map indicating the 366 <br />location of all proposed projects. 367 <br /> 368 <br />Councilmember Lyden asked about the streets where sewer doesn’t exist; is staff 369 <br />considering the possibility that those streets could be dug up in the future? Community 370 <br />Development Director Grochala said that sewer is considered within each project as 371 <br />information becomes available. 372 <br />Councilmember Ruhland asked how assessments are handled. Mr. Grochala noted that 373 <br />the cost of street construction is not assessed; sewer and water is assessed and can be 374 <br />spread over a fifteen year period. 375 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if home value increase with street reconstruction and Mr. 376 <br />Grochala suggested it is difficult to pinpoint but is possibly in the $3,000 to $5,000 range. 377