Laserfiche WebLink
<br />evaluated to eliminate the middle structure and provide one EOF. The CB between <br />Lot1 & 2 should be moved north onto Lot 2 so that it is not on the property li ne. This <br />is not possible to maintain minimum slopes. <br />25. The applicant shall update the drainage area characteristics for Pond 100 in <br />Appendix C. While the calculations appear to be correct, the applicant shall <br />update all ponds in Appendix C to indicate that 1.1” of runoff is the required <br />water quality volume for new impervious area. <br />Included in the updated <br />SWMP <br />26. The applicant shall confirm the elevations of the broad crested rectangular weir <br />outlets of Ponds P200. <br />Weir elevation updated in the <br />model <br />27. The applicant shall verify NWLs (Pond 300, Wetland C) and 100-year HWLs <br />(Pond 400) in Table 1. Note that infiltration basins do not have NWLs. <br />Normal water levels verified. <br />28. It is highly recomme nded (MPCA Stormwater Manual) that pond liners <br />be installed at wet po nds in A or B soils. <br />The MPCA stormwater manual recommends a liner for ponds in A or B soil to maintain <br />permanent pool. The ponds on the development intersect the water table so a liner is <br />not necessary. <br />The applicant shall note that proposed water quality ponds are not within a <br />Source Water Protection Area therefore they are not required to have a liner. <br />However, it will be the responsibility of the Developer to show that the proposed <br />dead pool volume can be maintained after construction. <br />Based on the water levels of the wetlands on-site, the dead pool volumes of the <br />proposed ponds are assumed to be maintained post construction. <br />29. The applicant shall confirm that the starting elevations for the HydroCAD <br />modeled storm pond storage start at the bottom of the pond (and not below). <br />Specific to Ponds P200. <br /> Pond 200 starts at 901.5 and the v-notch weir is set at 901.5. <br />30. On the Anoka County ditch system, there shall be consideration for beaver guards <br />at all surface water structures <br />Beaver guards will be discussed and confirmed with the ditch authority. <br />31. The applicant shall provide a design option, in coordination with RCWD, of <br />culvert 3 that would reduce the susceptibility to being plugged by beavers. <br />Please verify this is needed or can be something the City takes care of? This is not an <br />engineering design standard. <br />The ditch will be maintained by RCWD and Lake 200 will be the responsibility of the <br />home owners association. If a Beaver prevention devise is used it would installed with the <br />culvert and to be included in the plans. We will send the engineering information as we <br />receive it. <br />Plans updated with Clemson beaver pond leveler. <br />The applicant shall send the Beaver device to the ditch authority for <br />approval/acknowledgement. <br />32. The applicant shall include flumes at the west end of Street C or provide <br />information as to how the runoff will be maintained on site.