My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-24-2020 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2020
>
08-24-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2021 2:38:36 PM
Creation date
11/17/2021 11:50:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/24/2020
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 4 <br />Mayor Rafferty recalled the 2014 discussion where there was full input from different 130 <br />sides of the issue. That discussion concluded with people bringing forward some serious 131 <br />concerns about bees. 132 <br /> 133 <br />Councilmember Stoesz noted that he understands beekeeping because he grew up with it 134 <br />and it did exist in very rural areas. Understanding the amount of property in the City 135 <br />where bees are allowed, he is comfortable with the current regulations. 136 <br /> 137 <br />Councilmember Cavegn asked why bees are classified as farm animals and Ms. Larsen said 138 <br />it is recognized that it’s normally done commercially. She added that there are 139 <br />restrictions even on domestic animals such as dogs and cats. 140 <br /> 141 <br />Councilmember Ruhland noted his concern about stinging and families possibly being 142 <br />unaware of an extraordinary number of bees in their vicinity or in the area of a new home 143 <br />they purchase. 144 <br /> 145 <br />Councilmember Lyden noted that bees travel distances so really there are probably bees in 146 <br />all areas of the City, they’re just not being kept everywhere. 147 <br />5. Interim Accounting Services – City Administrator Cotton reviewed the written 148 <br />staff report outlining her recommendation that the City enter into a contract to receive 149 <br />certain accounting services. The services are required because there are currently two 150 <br />vacancies in the Finance Department. Costs are outlined in the report. She noted that she 151 <br />isn’t recommending the budgeting element but is recommending the bank reconciliation 152 <br />(for a of couple months) and TIF reporting (one time). Her hope is that this will be very 153 <br />limited and the new staff will be on duty soon. Ms. Cotton explained that she has some 154 <br />experience with the company and this is a common service for them. 155 <br /> 156 <br />The council received an update on the process for filling the vacant positions. 157 <br /> 158 <br />The council concurred and will see a request for official action on the next council agenda. 159 <br />6. 2021 Budget Assumptions – City Administrator Cott on reviewed her written 160 <br />staff report outlining certain budget assumptions and seeking to gain insight on 161 <br />outstanding assumptions and council priorities. There is an upcoming budget work 162 <br />session discussion scheduled. 163 <br /> 164 <br />- Cost of Living Adjustments – the Cit y has gained survey data as outlined in the report. 165 <br />Many cities are not able to predict this element due to the current conditions. Union 166 <br />negotiations for next year’s contracts are forthcoming and so a COLA increase has not yet 167 <br />been negotiated for 2021. At this stage staff is recommending the inclusion of an increase 168 <br />with the understanding it is fully under discussion. The council concurred that staff could 169 <br />replicate the process used last year to include a number in the budget. 170 <br /> 171
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.