Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 6 <br />replacement in 2021. Public Safety Director Swenson added that there will be at least 217 <br />three vehicles evaluated in 2022 and most likely more than that. Further when vehicles are 218 <br />being evaluated they are generally six to nine years old and that’s quite old for an 219 <br />emergency vehicle. Council comments included: generally cars last to 160,000 miles 220 <br />reliably; the warranty for police cars is 100,000 miles; there is time at the front end and 221 <br />back end when the car isn’t actually in use; there was a fleet car in the past that was 222 <br />planned to be sold with 40,000 miles; 21 cars for 27 sworn officers may be too many cars; 223 <br />important to recognize that the taxpayers should be charged fairly recognizing people 224 <br />move in and out. Ms. Cotton noted that vehicle purchase is financed by certificate (the 225 <br />City borrows from itself) and the fluctuation in needs/purchasing makes that a difficult 226 <br />process; if the City were able to fund purchases yearly that would be easier from a 227 <br />financing perspective. Ms. Cotton pointed out that there will be additional needs for fire 228 <br />equipment also, there is no funding planned for that and that will cause fluctuation also. 229 <br />Ms. Cotton suggested an all-vehicle purchasing plan review to find the best process. 230 <br />Director Swenson added that he has reported in the past to the council and explained the 231 <br />department’s needs. Ms. Cotton asked if the council would be comfortable with staff 232 <br />bringing forward a vehicle replacement option for the 2021 budget just for consideration. 233 <br /> 234 <br />Director Swenson discussed fire apparatus replacement. He reviewed the replacement 235 <br />schedule set forth in the written report. Administrator Cotton noted that the City 236 <br />currently does not have a plan to bond in the future for this type of equipment and bonding 237 <br />is something that must be planned. Councilmember Lyden asked if there are options for 238 <br />recertifying this type of equipment and Director Swenson said there is some language in 239 <br />the regulations regarding that but he noted the age of the equipment that would be 240 <br />replaced and the benefits to purchasing new equipment. Grant funding would always be 241 <br />sought when appropriate. Administrator Cotton noted that there are some remaining 242 <br />funds from the Centennial Fire District split. Ms. Cotton added that a comprehensive 243 <br />review of what is needed and what it will cost and the best way to fund is what staff will 244 <br />provide. 245 <br /> 246 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if staff will be able to separate IT costs in the budget this 247 <br />year. Administrator Cotton explained that there will be a level of information included 248 <br />because she’s asked directors to identify those costs in their individual budgets as much as 249 <br />that is possible. 250 <br />7. Public Purpose Expenditures – Human Resources Manager Bartholomew 251 <br />explained the changes staff is proposing to the policy that guides this area of expenditure 252 <br />of City funds. Clarifying this policy is intended to provide for transparency as well as 253 <br />providing guidance for employees. There is also a change proposed to how the City 254 <br />approaches employee appreciation. Whereas currently employees are recognized with a 255 <br />gift card when they reach milestones in years of services, the change would mean that 256 <br />employees would be recognized instead for excellent service. She feels that employees 257 <br />would prefer to be recognized for their work rather than their years and management 258 <br />would like to have this tool. Ms. Cotton added that she doesn’t see a budget impact for 259 <br />the changes and she explained that the management team has loosely discussed how the 260