Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />DRAFT <br />6 <br />Councilmember Ruhland remarked that he was on Planning and Zoning at a time when a variance for 199 <br />a similar situation was approved. He recalls in that situation, it was difficult to see the difference in 200 <br />the roof when it was installed. For this site, he has looked at Google Earth and thinks the impact to 201 <br />the area is minimal. He doesn’t approve of the council having to consider this after the fact. In 202 <br />consideration of changing the ordinance, he pointed out that a denial tonight may end up with the 203 <br />situation being allowed under new regulations. Mayor Rafferty noted that tonight’s discussion is only 204 <br />about the variance. 205 <br />Councilmember Cavegn asked if there are materials that will still be purchased. If so, and the variance 206 <br />is grant those materials should be up to City Code requirements. 207 <br /> 208 <br />The property owner (Kathleen Behr, 7831 Lake Drive) explained how minimal the difference will be 209 <br />and how few people would be impacted or would probably even notice. She added that when she 210 <br />purchased the roofing materials, they were identified for residential use. She also has labor issues 211 <br />since the warm weather that will allow the installation is passing quickly. The project is related to 212 <br />storm damage and she explained that the metal roofs should be much more durable. 213 <br />Councilmember Stoesz recognized that the materials are already purchased but a variance is serious 214 <br />and he will probably not support it. 215 <br />Mayor Rafferty noted that the City has regulations and they must be followed. He doesn’t believe 216 <br />that a house being out of sight allows someone to not follow the rules. He expects that some of the 217 <br />materials could be returned. 218 <br />Ms. Behr noted that she has $3,000 into the project (including the variance cost) and it’s become 219 <br />something that she can’t afford. 220 <br />Mayor Rafferty said he favors the ordinance as it is written. 221 <br />Councilmember Lyden said he thinks in life that kindness matters. He sees the Planning and Zoning 222 <br />Board recommendation to approve. He also noted that Mayor Rafferty was on the council when the 223 <br />previous variance was approved. 224 <br />Councilmember Cavegn offered a proposal to allow the project for the materials already purchased but 225 <br />require code compliance for the other buildings on the property. 226 <br />Councilmember Lyden moved to approve the product that the applicant has bought and allow the 227 <br />purchase of additional same materials for the other garages. Councilmember Stoesz seconded the 228 <br />motion. Councilmember Stoesz withdrew his second. Motion failed for lack of second. 229 <br />Councilmember Cavegn moved to approve a variance for the home but not the two garages. 230 <br />Councilmember Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Councilmember 231 <br />Stoesz and Mayor Rafferty recorded as voting no. 232 <br />6D) Stern Addition: i) Consider Resolution No. 20-96 Approving Final Plat; ii) Consider 233 <br />Resolution No. 20-97 Approving Development Agreement – City Planner Larsen reviewed a 234 <br />PowerPoint presentation that included information on the following: 235 <br />- Land use application (to allow addition of one additional single family home); 236 <br />- Final Plat (found to conform); 237 <br />- Shoreline Buffer Zone location consideration (buffer required); 238 <br />- Planning and Zoning Board approval (5-0); 239