Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />DRAFT <br />2 <br />PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT 40 <br />There was no report from the Public Services Department. 41 <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT 42 <br />6A) NE Drainage Area Improvement Project – i. Consider Resolution No. 20-101, Order 43 <br />Project, Approve the Plans and Specifications and Authorize the Ad for Bids; ii. Consider 44 <br />Resolution No. 20-113, Approving Permit Agreement with the Board of Water Commissioners of 45 <br />the City of Saint Paul – City Engineer Hankee noted the resolutions that would order the project and 46 <br />set in place an agreement with the City of St. Paul. A figure was shown indicating existing 47 <br />drainage (through drain tiles) in the NE area of the City. Ms. Hankee noted the size and location of 48 <br />the improvement area. The City has been working on a drainage project to serve the area for 49 <br />multiple years and has vetted different alternatives for drainage. The resulting recommendation is a 50 <br />phased project that will include modeling and permit consideration to avoid negative impacts on 51 <br />Peltier Lake. A best management practice system was used to ensure the betterment of the water 52 <br />system. The first phase would be piping. Acquisition of properties as needed is underway. The 53 <br />project is funded through the Surface Water Management Fund, an appropriate source. The 54 <br />estimated cost is $1.2 million. The proposed schedule going forward was reviewed. There is a 55 <br />small strip of land that is owned by the City of St. Paul and hence the need for an agreement. 56 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if there is any guidance that would limit or allow certain working 57 <br />hours. Ms. Hankee noted that currently the project work would be done during allowed construction 58 <br />hours only. She doesn’t suspect there would be much benefit to allowing extended hours but the 59 <br />City can remain open to the idea if it makes sense. Mayor Rafferty said it makes sense to hear about 60 <br />those on a case by case basis. 61 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if all water will be moved to Lake Peltier or will there be some water 62 <br />moved to the south. Ms. Hankee pointed out an area that will still drain to the south. 63 <br />Councilmember Stoesz moved to approve Resolution No. 20-101 as presented. Councilmember 64 <br />Cavegn seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 65 <br />Councilmember Stoesz moved to approve Resolution No. 20-113 as presented. Councilmember 66 <br />Cavegn seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 67 <br />6B) Public Hearing. Consider Resolution No. 20-114, Adopting Assessment Role, 2020 Weed 68 <br />Abatement Charges – Community Development Director Grochala noted that the City code 69 <br />identifies weed violations. If violations are identified, City staff follows a process of notification 70 <br />followed by weed removal if necessary. There is one case presented this year where City removal 71 <br />occurred, costs were not paid, so therefore the cost will be assessed to the property. Notification of 72 <br />actions is provided to the property owner. 73 <br />Mayor Rafferty opened the public hearing. There being no one present wishing to speak, the public 74 <br />hearing was closed. 75 <br />Councilmember Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 20-114 as presented. Councilmember 76 <br />Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 77 <br />6C) 2021 Street Improvement Projects – i. Consider Resolution 20-115, Authorize the 78 <br />Preparation of Plans and Specs; ii. Consider Resolution No. 20-116, Approving Design Engineering 79 <br />Services Contract with WSB & Associates – City Engineer Hankee reviewed a presentation. Two 80 <br />resolutions are before the council. The City’s Pavement Management Plan was explained; the 81 <br />City’s roadways and their condition is identified through the Plan; a maintenance program is 82